中英文敏感词、语言检测、中外手机/电话归属地/运营商查询、名字推断性别、手机号抽取、身份证抽取、邮箱抽取、中日文人名库、中文缩写库、拆字词典、词汇情感值、停用词、反动词表、暴恐词表、繁简体转换、英文模拟中文发音、汪峰歌词生成器、职业名称词库、同义词库、反义词库、否定词库、汽车品牌词库、汽车零件词库、连续英文切割、各种中文词向量、公司名字大全、古诗词库、IT词库、财经词库、成语词库、地名词库、历史名人词库、诗词词库、医学词库、饮食词库、法律词库、汽车词库、动物词库、中文聊天语料、中文谣言数据、百度中文问答数据集、句子相似度匹配算法集合、bert资源、文本生成&摘要相关工具、cocoNLP信息抽取工具、国内电话号码正则匹配、清华大学XLORE:中英文跨语言百科知识图谱、清华大学人工智能技术系列报告、自然语言生成、NLU太难了系列、自动对联数据及机器人、用户名黑名单列表、罪名法务名词及分类模型、微信公众号语料、cs224n深度学习自然语言处理课程、中文手写汉字识别、中文自然语言处理 语料/数据集、变量命名神器、分词语料库+代码、任务型对话英文数据集、ASR 语音数据集 + 基于深度学习的中文语音识别系统、笑声检测器、Microsoft多语言数字/单位/如日期时间识别包、中华新华字典数据库及api(包括常用歇后语、成语、词语和汉字)、文档图谱自动生成、SpaCy 中文模型、Common Voice语音识别数据集新版、神经网络关系抽取、基于bert的命名实体识别、关键词(Keyphrase)抽取包pke、基于医疗领域知识图谱的问答系统、基于依存句法与语义角色标注的事件三元组抽取、依存句法分析4万句高质量标注数据、cnocr：用来做中文OCR的Python3包、中文人物关系知识图谱项目、中文nlp竞赛项目及代码汇总、中文字符数据、speech-aligner: 从“人声语音”及其“语言文本”产生音素级别时间对齐标注的工具、AmpliGraph: 知识图谱表示学习(Python)库：知识图谱概念链接预测、Scattertext 文本可视化(python)、语言/知识表示工具：BERT & ERNIE、中文对比英文自然语言处理NLP的区别综述、Synonyms中文近义词工具包、HarvestText领域自适应文本挖掘工具（新词发现-情感分析-实体链接等）、word2word：(Python)方便易用的多语言词-词对集：62种语言/3,564个多语言对、语音识别语料生成工具：从具有音频/字幕的在线视频创建自动语音识别(ASR)语料库、构建医疗实体识别的模型（包含词典和语料标注）、单文档非监督的关键词抽取、Kashgari中使用gpt-2语言模型、开源的金融投资数据提取工具、文本自动摘要库TextTeaser: 仅支持英文、人民日报语料处理工具集、一些关于自然语言的基本模型、基于14W歌曲知识库的问答尝试--功能包括歌词接龙and已知歌词找歌曲以及歌曲歌手歌词三角关系的问答、基于Siamese bilstm模型的相似句子判定模型并提供训练数据集和测试数据集、用Transformer编解码模型实现的根据Hacker News文章标题自动生成评论、用BERT进行序列标记和文本分类的模板代码、LitBank：NLP数据集——支持自然语言处理和计算人文学科任务的100部带标记英文小说语料、百度开源的基准信息抽取系统、虚假新闻数据集、Facebook: LAMA语言模型分析，提供Transformer-XL/BERT/ELMo/GPT预训练语言模型的统一访问接口、CommonsenseQA：面向常识的英文QA挑战、中文知识图谱资料、数据及工具、各大公司内部里大牛分享的技术文档 PDF 或者 PPT、自然语言生成SQL语句（英文）、中文NLP数据增强（EDA）工具、英文NLP数据增强工具 、基于医药知识图谱的智能问答系统、京东商品知识图谱、基于mongodb存储的军事领域知识图谱问答项目、基于远监督的中文关系抽取、语音情感分析、中文ULMFiT-情感分析-文本分类-语料及模型、一个拍照做题程序、世界各国大规模人名库、一个利用有趣中文语料库 qingyun 训练出来的中文聊天机器人、中文聊天机器人seqGAN、省市区镇行政区划数据带拼音标注、教育行业新闻语料库包含自动文摘功能、开放了对话机器人-知识图谱-语义理解-自然语言处理工具及数据、中文知识图谱：基于百度百科中文页面-抽取三元组信息-构建中文知识图谱、masr: 中文语音识别-提供预训练模型-高识别率、Python音频数据增广库、中文全词覆盖BERT及两份阅读理解数据、ConvLab：开源多域端到端对话系统平台、中文自然语言处理数据集、基于最新版本rasa搭建的对话系统、基于TensorFlow和BERT的管道式实体及关系抽取、一个小型的证券知识图谱/知识库、复盘所有NLP比赛的TOP方案、OpenCLaP：多领域开源中文预训练语言模型仓库、UER：基于不同语料+编码器+目标任务的中文预训练模型仓库、中文自然语言处理向量合集、基于金融-司法领域(兼有闲聊性质)的聊天机器人、g2pC：基于上下文的汉语读音自动标记模块、Zincbase 知识图谱构建工具包、诗歌质量评价/细粒度情感诗歌语料库、快速转化「中文数字」和「阿拉伯数字」、百度知道问答语料库、基于知识图谱的问答系统、jieba_fast 加速版的jieba、正则表达式教程、中文阅读理解数据集、基于BERT等最新语言模型的抽取式摘要提取、Python利用深度学习进行文本摘要的综合指南、知识图谱深度学习相关资料整理、维基大规模平行文本语料、StanfordNLP 0.2.0：纯Python版自然语言处理包、NeuralNLP-NeuralClassifier：腾讯开源深度学习文本分类工具、端到端的封闭域对话系统、中文命名实体识别：NeuroNER vs. BertNER、新闻事件线索抽取、2019年百度的三元组抽取比赛：“科学空间队”源码、基于依存句法的开放域文本知识三元组抽取和知识库构建、中文的GPT2训练代码、ML-NLP - 机器学习(Machine Learning)NLP面试中常考到的知识点和代码实现、nlp4han:中文自然语言处理工具集(断句/分词/词性标注/组块/句法分析/语义分析/NER/N元语法/HMM/代词消解/情感分析/拼写检查、XLM：Facebook的跨语言预训练语言模型、用基于BERT的微调和特征提取方法来进行知识图谱百度百科人物词条属性抽取、中文自然语言处理相关的开放任务-数据集-当前最佳结果、CoupletAI - 基于CNN+Bi-LSTM+Attention 的自动对对联系统、抽象知识图谱、MiningZhiDaoQACorpus - 580万百度知道问答数据挖掘项目、brat rapid annotation tool: 序列标注工具、大规模中文知识图谱数据：1.4亿实体、数据增强在机器翻译及其他nlp任务中的应用及效果、allennlp阅读理解:支持多种数据和模型、PDF表格数据提取工具 、 Graphbrain：AI开源软件库和科研工具，目的是促进自动意义提取和文本理解以及知识的探索和推断、简历自动筛选系统、基于命名实体识别的简历自动摘要、中文语言理解测评基准，包括代表性的数据集&基准模型&语料库&排行榜、树洞 OCR 文字识别 、从包含表格的扫描图片中识别表格和文字、语声迁移、Python口语自然语言处理工具集(英文)、 similarity：相似度计算工具包，java编写、海量中文预训练ALBERT模型 、Transformers 2.0 、基于大规模音频数据集Audioset的音频增强 、Poplar：网页版自然语言标注工具、图片文字去除，可用于漫画翻译 、186种语言的数字叫法库、Amazon发布基于知识的人-人开放领域对话数据集 、中文文本纠错模块代码、繁简体转换 、 Python实现的多种文本可读性评价指标、类似于人名/地名/组织机构名的命名体识别数据集 、东南大学《知识图谱》研究生课程(资料)、. 英文拼写检查库 、 wwsearch是企业微信后台自研的全文检索引擎、CHAMELEON：深度学习新闻推荐系统元架构 、 8篇论文梳理BERT相关模型进展与反思、DocSearch：免费文档搜索引擎、 LIDA：轻量交互式对话标注工具 、aili - the fastest in-memory index in the East 东半球最快并发索引 、知识图谱车音工作项目、自然语言生成资源大全 、中日韩分词库mecab的Python接口库、中文文本摘要/关键词提取、汉字字符特征提取器 (featurizer)，提取汉字的特征（发音特征、字形特征）用做深度学习的特征、中文生成任务基准测评 、中文缩写数据集、中文任务基准测评 - 代表性的数据集-基准(预训练)模型-语料库-baseline-工具包-排行榜、PySS3：面向可解释AI的SS3文本分类器机器可视化工具 、中文NLP数据集列表、COPE - 格律诗编辑程序、doccano：基于网页的开源协同多语言文本标注工具 、PreNLP：自然语言预处理库、简单的简历解析器，用来从简历中提取关键信息、用于中文闲聊的GPT2模型：GPT2-chitchat、基于检索聊天机器人多轮响应选择相关资源列表(Leaderboards、Datasets、Papers)、(Colab)抽象文本摘要实现集锦(教程 、词语拼音数据、高效模糊搜索工具、NLP数据增广资源集、微软对话机器人框架 、 GitHub Typo Corpus：大规模GitHub多语言拼写错误/语法错误数据集、TextCluster：短文本聚类预处理模块 Short text cluster、面向语音识别的中文文本规范化、BLINK：最先进的实体链接库、BertPunc：基于BERT的最先进标点修复模型、Tokenizer：快速、可定制的文本词条化库、中文语言理解测评基准，包括代表性的数据集、基准(预训练)模型、语料库、排行榜、spaCy 医学文本挖掘与信息提取 、 NLP任务示例项目代码集、 python拼写检查库、chatbot-list - 行业内关于智能客服、聊天机器人的应用和架构、算法分享和介绍、语音质量评价指标(MOSNet, BSSEval, STOI, PESQ, SRMR)、 用138GB语料训练的法文RoBERTa预训练语言模型 、BERT-NER-Pytorch：三种不同模式的BERT中文NER实验、无道词典 - 有道词典的命令行版本，支持英汉互查和在线查询、2019年NLP亮点回顾、 Chinese medical dialogue data 中文医疗对话数据集 、最好的汉字数字(中文数字)-阿拉伯数字转换工具、 基于百科知识库的中文词语多词义/义项获取与特定句子词语语义消歧、awesome-nlp-sentiment-analysis - 情感分析、情绪原因识别、评价对象和评价词抽取、LineFlow：面向所有深度学习框架的NLP数据高效加载器、中文医学NLP公开资源整理 、MedQuAD：(英文)医学问答数据集、将自然语言数字串解析转换为整数和浮点数、Transfer Learning in Natural Language Processing (NLP) 、面向语音识别的中文/英文发音辞典、Tokenizers：注重性能与多功能性的最先进分词器、CLUENER 细粒度命名实体识别 Fine Grained Named Entity Recognition、 基于BERT的中文命名实体识别、中文谣言数据库、NLP数据集/基准任务大列表、nlp相关的一些论文及代码, 包括主题模型、词向量(Word Embedding)、命名实体识别(NER)、文本分类(Text Classificatin)、文本生成(Text Generation)、文本相似性(Text Similarity)计算等，涉及到各种与nlp相关的算法，基于keras和tensorflow 、Python文本挖掘/NLP实战示例、 Blackstone：面向非结构化法律文本的spaCy pipeline和NLP模型通过同义词替换实现文本“变脸” 、中文 预训练 ELECTREA 模型: 基于对抗学习 pretrain Chinese Model 、albert-chinese-ner - 用预训练语言模型ALBERT做中文NER 、基于GPT2的特定主题文本生成/文本增广、开源预训练语言模型合集、多语言句向量包、编码、标记和实现：一种可控高效的文本生成方法、 英文脏话大列表 、attnvis：GPT2、BERT等transformer语言模型注意力交互可视化、CoVoST：Facebook发布的多语种语音-文本翻译语料库，包括11种语言(法语、德语、荷兰语、俄语、西班牙语、意大利语、土耳其语、波斯语、瑞典语、蒙古语和中文)的语音、文字转录及英文译文、Jiagu自然语言处理工具 - 以BiLSTM等模型为基础，提供知识图谱关系抽取 中文分词 词性标注 命名实体识别 情感分析 新词发现 关键词 文本摘要 文本聚类等功能、用unet实现对文档表格的自动检测，表格重建、NLP事件提取文献资源列表 、 金融领域自然语言处理研究资源大列表、CLUEDatasetSearch - 中英文NLP数据集：搜索所有中文NLP数据集，附常用英文NLP数据集 、medical_NER - 中文医学知识图谱命名实体识别 、(哈佛)讲因果推理的免费书、知识图谱相关学习资料/数据集/工具资源大列表、Forte：灵活强大的自然语言处理pipeline工具集 、Python字符串相似性算法库、PyLaia：面向手写文档分析的深度学习工具包、TextFooler：针对文本分类/推理的对抗文本生成模块、Haystack：灵活、强大的可扩展问答(QA)框架、中文关键短语抽取工具

AI PDF chatbot agent built with LangChain & LangGraph

PDF GPT allows you to chat with the contents of your PDF file by using GPT capabilities. The most effective open source solution to turn your pdf files in a chatbot!

Yes, it's another chat over documents implementation... but this one is entirely local!

AI chatbot 🤖 for chat with CSV, PDF, TXT files 📄 and YTB videos 🎥 | using Langchain🦜 | OpenAI | Streamlit ⚡

Easily deployable and scalable backend server that efficiently converts various document formats (pdf, docx, pptx, html, images, etc) into Markdown. With support for both CPU and GPU processing, it is Ideal for large-scale workflows, it offers text/table extraction, OCR, and batch processing with sync/async endpoints.

A dynamic, scalable AI chatbot built with Django REST framework, supporting custom training from PDFs, documents, websites, and YouTube videos. Leveraging OpenAI's GPT-3.5, Pinecone, FAISS, and Celery for seamless integration and performance.

MIT Introduction to Deep Learning (6.S191) Instructors: Alexander Amini and Ava Soleimany Course Information Summary Prerequisites Schedule Lectures Labs, Final Projects, Grading, and Prizes Software labs Gather.Town lab + Office Hour sessions Final project Paper Review Project Proposal Presentation Project Proposal Grading Rubric Past Project Proposal Ideas Awards + Categories Important Links and Emails Course Information Summary MIT's introductory course on deep learning methods with applications to computer vision, natural language processing, biology, and more! Students will gain foundational knowledge of deep learning algorithms and get practical experience in building neural networks in TensorFlow. Course concludes with a project proposal competition with feedback from staff and a panel of industry sponsors. Prerequisites We expect basic knowledge of calculus (e.g., taking derivatives), linear algebra (e.g., matrix multiplication), and probability (e.g., Bayes theorem) -- we'll try to explain everything else along the way! Experience in Python is helpful but not necessary. This class is taught during MIT's IAP term by current MIT PhD researchers. Listeners are welcome! Schedule Monday Jan 18, 2021 Lecture: Introduction to Deep Learning and NNs Lab: Lab 1A Tensorflow and building NNs from scratch Tuesday Jan 19, 2021 Lecture: Deep Sequence Modelling Lab: Lab 1B Music Generation using RNNs Wednesday Jan 20, 2021 Lecture: Deep Computer Vision Lab: Lab 2A Image classification and detection Thursday Jan 21, 2021 Lecture: Deep Generative Modelling Lab: Lab 2B Debiasing facial recognition systems Friday Jan 22, 2021 Lecture: Deep Reinforcement Learning Lab: Lab 3 pixel-to-control planning Monday Jan 25, 2021 Lecture: Limitations and New Frontiers Lab: Lab 3 continued Tuesday Jan 26, 2021 Lecture (part 1): Evidential Deep Learning Lecture (part 2): Bias and Fairness Lab: Work on final assignments Lab competition entries due at 11:59pm ET on Canvas! Lab 1, Lab 2, and Lab 3 Wednesday Jan 27, 2021 Lecture (part 1): Nigel Duffy, Ernst & Young Lecture (part 2): Kate Saenko, Boston University and MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab Lab: Work on final assignments Assignments due: Sign up for Final Project Competition Thursday Jan 28, 2021 Lecture (part 1): Sanja Fidler, U. Toronto, Vector Institute, and NVIDIA Lecture (part 2): Katherine Chou, Google Lab: Work on final assignments Assignments due: 1 page paper review (if applicable) Friday Jan 29, 2021 Lecture: Student project pitch competition Lab: Awards ceremony and prize giveaway Assignments due: Project proposals (if applicable) Lectures Lectures will be held starting at 1:00pm ET from Jan 18 - Jan 29 2021, Monday through Friday, virtually through Zoom. Current MIT students, faculty, postdocs, researchers, staff, etc. will be able to access the lectures during this two week period, synchronously or asynchronously, via the MIT Canvas course webpage (MIT internal only). Lecture recordings will be uploaded to the Canvas as soon as possible; students are not required to attend any lectures synchronously. Please see the Canvas for details on Zoom links. The public edition of the course will only be made available after completion of the MIT course. Labs, Final Projects, Grading, and Prizes Course will be graded during MIT IAP for 6 units under P/D/F grading. Receiving a passing grade requires completion of each software lab project (through honor code, with submission required to enter lab competitions), a final project proposal/presentation or written review of a deep learning paper (submission required), and attendance/lecture viewing (through honor code). Submission of a written report or presentation of a project proposal will ensure a passing grade. MIT students will be eligible for prizes and awards as part of the class competitions. There will be two parts to the competitions: (1) software labs and (2) final projects. More information is provided below. Winners will be announced on the last day of class, with thousands of dollars of prizes being given away! Software labs There are three TensorFlow software lab exercises for the course, designed as iPython notebooks hosted in Google Colab. Software labs can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/aamini/introtodeeplearning. These are self-paced exercises and are designed to help you gain practical experience implementing neural networks in TensorFlow. For registered MIT students, submission of lab materials is not necessary to get credit for the course or to pass the course. At the end of each software lab there will be task-associated materials to submit (along with instructions) for entry into the competitions, open to MIT students and affiliates during the IAP offering. This includes MIT students/affiliates who are taking the class as listeners -- you are eligible! These instructions are provided at the end of each of the labs. Completing these tasks and submitting your materials to Canvas will enter you into a per-lab competition. MIT students and affiliates will be eligible for prizes during the IAP offering; at the end of the course, prize-winners will be awarded with their prizes. All competition submissions are due on January 26 at 11:59pm ET to Canvas. For the software lab competitions, submissions will be judged on the basis of the following criteria: Strength and quality of final results (lab dependent) Soundness of implementation and approach Thoroughness and quality of provided descriptions and figures Gather.Town lab + Office Hour sessions After each day’s lecture, there will be open Office Hours in the class GatherTown, up until 3pm ET. An MIT email is required to log in and join the GatherTown. During these sessions, there will not be a walk through or dictation of the labs; the labs are designed to be self-paced and to be worked on on your own time. The GatherTown sessions will be hosted by course staff and are held so you can: Ask questions on course lectures, labs, logistics, project, or anything else; Work on the labs in the presence of classmates/TAs/instructors; Meet classmates to find groups for the final project; Group work time for the final project; Bring the class community together. Final project To satisfy the final project requirement for this course, students will have two options: (1) write a 1 page paper review (single-spaced) on a recent deep learning paper of your choice or (2) participate and present in the project proposal pitch competition. The 1 page paper review option is straightforward, we propose some papers within this document to help you get started, and you can satisfy a passing grade with this option -- you will not be eligible for the grand prizes. On the other hand, participation in the project proposal pitch competition will equivalently satisfy your course requirements but additionally make you eligible for the grand prizes. See the section below for more details and requirements for each of these options. Paper Review Students may satisfy the final project requirement by reading and reviewing a recent deep learning paper of their choosing. In the written review, students should provide both: 1) a description of the problem, technical approach, and results of the paper; 2) critical analysis and exposition of the limitations of the work and opportunities for future work. Reviews should be submitted on Canvas by Thursday Jan 28, 2021, 11:59:59pm Eastern Time (ET). Just a few paper options to consider... https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2018/file/69386f6bb1dfed68692a24c8686939b9-Paper.pdf https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf https://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6419/1140 https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2018/file/0e64a7b00c83e3d22ce6b3acf2c582b6-Paper.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.11829.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-020-00237-3 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32084340/ Project Proposal Presentation Keyword: proposal This is a 2 week course so we do not require results or working implementations! However, to win the top prizes, nice, clear results and implementations will demonstrate feasibility of your proposal which is something we look for! Logistics -- please read! You must sign up to present before 11:59:59pm Eastern Time (ET) on Wednesday Jan 27, 2021 Slides must be in a Google Slide before 11:59:59pm Eastern Time (ET) on Thursday Jan 28, 2021 Project groups can be between 1 and 5 people Listeners welcome To be eligible for a prize you must have at least 1 registered MIT student in your group Each participant will only be allowed to be in one group and present one project pitch Synchronous attendance on 1/29/21 is required to make the project pitch! 3 min presentation on your idea (we will be very strict with the time limits) Prizes! (see below) Sign up to Present here: by 11:59pm ET on Wednesday Jan 27 Once you sign up, make your slide in the following Google Slides; submit by midnight on Thursday Jan 28. Please specify the project group # on your slides!!! Things to Consider This doesn’t have to be a new deep learning method. It can just be an interesting application that you apply some existing deep learning method to. What problem are you solving? Are there use cases/applications? Why do you think deep learning methods might be suited to this task? How have people done it before? Is it a new task? If so, what are similar tasks that people have worked on? In what aspects have they succeeded or failed? What is your method of solving this problem? What type of model + architecture would you use? Why? What is the data for this task? Do you need to make a dataset or is there one publicly available? What are the characteristics of the data? Is it sparse, messy, imbalanced? How would you deal with that? Project Proposal Grading Rubric Project proposals will be evaluated by a panel of judges on the basis of the following three criteria: 1) novelty and impact; 2) technical soundness, feasibility, and organization, including quality of any presented results; 3) clarity and presentation. Each judge will award a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) for each of the criteria; the average score from each judge across these criteria will then be averaged with that of the other judges to provide the final score. The proposals with the highest final scores will be selected for prizes. Here are the guidelines for the criteria: Novelty and impact: encompasses the potential impact of the project idea, its novelty with respect to existing approaches. Why does the proposed work matter? What problem(s) does it solve? Why are these problems important? Technical soundness, feasibility, and organization: encompasses all technical aspects of the proposal. Do the proposed methodology and architecture make sense? Is the architecture the best suited for the proposed problem? Is deep learning the best approach for the problem? How realistic is it to implement the idea? Was there any implementation of the method? If results and data are presented, we will evaluate the strength of the results/data. Clarity and presentation: encompasses the delivery and quality of the presentation itself. Is the talk well organized? Are the slides aesthetically compelling? Is there a clear, well-delivered narrative? Are the problem and proposed method clearly presented? Past Project Proposal Ideas Recipe Generation with RNNs Can we compress videos with CNN + RNN? Music Generation with RNNs Style Transfer Applied to X GAN’s on a new modality Summarizing text/news articles Combining news articles about similar events Code or spec generation Multimodal speech → handwriting Generate handwriting based on keywords (i.e. cursive, slanted, neat) Predicting stock market trends Show language learners articles or videos at their level Transfer of writing style Chemical Synthesis with Recurrent Neural networks Transfer learning to learn something in a domain for which it’s hard or risky to gather data or do training RNNs to model some type of time series data Computer vision to coach sports players Computer vision system for safety brakes or warnings Use IBM Watson API to get the sentiment of your Facebook newsfeed Deep learning webcam to give wifi-access to friends or improve video chat in some way Domain-specific chatbot to help you perform a specific task Detect whether a signature is fraudulent Awards + Categories Final Project Awards: 1x NVIDIA RTX 3080 4x Google Home Max 3x Display Monitors Software Lab Awards: Bose headphones (Lab 1) Display monitor (Lab 2) Bebop drone (Lab 3) Important Links and Emails Course website: http://introtodeeplearning.com Course staff: introtodeeplearning-staff@mit.edu Piazza forum (MIT only): https://piazza.com/mit/spring2021/6s191 Canvas (MIT only): https://canvas.mit.edu/courses/8291 Software lab repository: https://github.com/aamini/introtodeeplearning Lab/office hour sessions (MIT only): https://gather.town/app/56toTnlBrsKCyFgj/MITDeepLearning

Gemini PDF Chatbot: A Streamlit-based application powered by the Gemini conversational AI model. Upload multiple PDF files, extract text, and engage in natural language conversations to receive detailed responses based on the document context. Enhance your interaction with PDF documents using this intuitive and intelligent chatbot.

This Chatbot is an interactive app developed to assist users to interact with their PDF. It is built using Open Source Stack. No OpenAI is required.

Bookmarklet to export the content from chatbots to a PDF or text with a single click. Supports Claude, ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini.

A multi-pdf chatbot based on RAG architecture, allows users to upload multiple pdfs and ask questions from them.

javascript implementation of a PDF chatbot

This repository contains implementations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in Jupyter notebooks. It includes examples of building chatbots with and without history, processing PDFs with RAG, and using DeepSeek models for local RAG and financial document analysis.

GENARATED BY NISHEN Mtroid whatsApp bot 🪀 Command:`setup `✨️ Description:` edit bot settings `⚠️️ Warn `🪀 Command:` install <br> `✨️ Description:` Install external plugins. <br> `⚠️️ Warn:` Get plugins only from https://t.me/AlphaXplugin. `🪀 Command:` plugin<br> `✨️ Description:` Shows the plugins you have installed. `🪀 Command:` remove<br> `✨️ Description:` Removes the plugin. `🪀 Command:` admin<br> `✨️ Description:` Admin menu. `🪀 Command:` ban <br> `✨️ Description:` Ban someone in the group. Reply to message or tag a person to use command. `🪀 Command:` gname <br> `✨️ Description:` Change group name. `🪀 Command:` gdesc<br> `✨️ Description:` Change group discription. `🪀 Command:` dis <br> `✨️ Description:`  Disappearing message on/off. <br> `💡 Example:` .dis on/off `🪀 Command:` reset<br> `✨️ Description:` Reset group invitation link. `🪀 Command:` gpp<br> `✨️ Description:` Set group profile picture `🪀 Command:` add<br> `✨️ Description:` Adds someone to the group. `🪀 Command:` promote <br> `✨️ Description:` Makes any person an admin. `🪀 Command:` demote <br> `✨️ Description:` Takes the authority of any admin. `🪀 Command:` mute <br> `✨️ Description:` Mute the group chat. Only the admins can send a message. ⌨️ Example: .mute & .mute 5m etc `🪀 Command:` unmute <br> `✨️ Description:` Unmute the group chat. Anyone can send a message. `🪀 Command:` invite <br> `✨️ Description:` Provides the group's invitation link. `🪀 Command:` afk <br> `✨️ Description:` It makes you AFK - Away From Keyboard. `🪀 Command:` art pack<br> `✨️ Description:` Beautifull artpack with more than 100 messages. `🪀 Command:` aspm <br> `✨️ Description:` This command for any emergency situation about any kind of WhatsApp SPAM in Group `🪀 Command:` alag <br> `✨️ Description:` This command for any emergency situation about any kind of WhatsApp SPAM in Chat `🪀 Command:` linkblock <br> `✨️ Description:` Activates the block link tool. <br> `💡 Example:` .linkblock on / off `🪀 Command:` CrAsH<br> `✨️ Description:` send BUG VIRUS to group. `🪀 Command:` CrAsH high<br> `✨️ Description:` send BUG VIRUS to group untill you stop. `🪀 Command:` -carbon `🪀 Command:` clear<br> `✨️ Description:` Clears all the messages from the chat. `🪀 Command:` qr <br> `✨️ Description:` To create an qr code from the word you give. `🪀 Command:` bcode <br> `✨️ Description:` To create an barcode from the word you give. `🪀 Command:` compliment<br> `✨️ Description:` It sends complimentry sentenses. `🪀 Command:` toaudio<br> `✨️ Description:` Converts video to sound. `🪀 Command:` toimage<br> `✨️ Description:` Converts the sticker to a photo. `🪀 Command:` tovideo<br> `✨️ Description:` Converts animated stickers to video. `🪀 Command:` deepai<br> `✨️ Description:` Runs the most powerful artificial intelligence tools using artificial neural networks. `🪀 Command:` details<br> `✨️ Description:` Displays metadata data of group or person. `🪀 Command:` dict <br> `✨️ Description:` Use it as a dictionary. Eg: .dict enUS;lead For supporting languages send •.lngcode• `🪀 Command:` dst<br> `✨️ Description:` Download status you repled. `🪀 Command:` emedia<br> `✨️ Description:` It is a plugin with more than 25 media tools. `🪀 Command:` emoji <br> `✨️ Description:` You can get Emoji as image. `🪀 Command:` print <br> `✨️ Description:` Prints the inside of the file on the server. `🪀 Command:` bashmedia <br> `✨️ Description:` Sends audio, video and photos inside the server. <br> `💡 Example:` video.mp4 && media/gif/pic.mp4 `🪀 Command:` addserver<br> `✨️ Description:` Uploads image, audio or video to the server. `🪀 Command:` term <br> `✨️ Description:` Allows to run the command on the server's shell. `🪀 Command:` mediainfo<br> `✨️ Description:` Shows the technical information of the replied video. `🪀 Command:` pmsend <br> `✨️ Description:` Sends a private message to the replied person. `🪀 Command:` pmttssend <br> `✨️ Description:` Sends a private voice message to the respondent. `🪀 Command:` ffmpeg <br> `✨️ Description:` Applies the desired ffmpeg filter to the video. ⌨️ Example: .ffmpeg fade=in:0:30 `🪀 Command:` filter <br> `✨️ Description:` It adds a filter. If someone writes your filter, it send the answer. If you just write .filter, it show's your filter list. `🪀 Command:` stop <br> `✨️ Description:` Stops the filter you added previously. `🪀 Command:` bgmlist<br> `✨️ Description:` Bgm List. `🪀 Command:` github <br> `✨️ Description:` It Send Github User Data. <br> `💡 Example:` .github WhatsApp `🪀 Command:` welcome<br> `✨️ Description:` It sets the welcome message. If you leave it blank it shows the welcome message. `🪀 Command:` goodbye<br> `✨️ Description:` Sets the goodbye message. If you leave blank, it show's the goodbye message. `🪀 Command:` help<br> `✨️ Description:` Gives information about using the bot from the Help menu. `🪀 Command:` varset <br> `✨️ Description:` Changes the text of modules like alive, afk etc.. `🪀 Command:` restart<br> `✨️ Description:` Restart bot. `🪀 Command:` poweroff<br> `✨️ Description:` Shutdown bot. `🪀 Command:` dyno<br> `✨️ Description:` Check heroku dyno usage `🪀 Command:` setvar <br> `✨️ Description:` Set heroku config var `🪀 Command:` delvar <br> `✨️ Description:` Delete heroku config var `🪀 Command:` getvar <br> `✨️ Description:` Get heroku config var `🪀 Command:` hpmod <br> `✨️ Description:` To get mod apps info. `🪀 Command:` insult<br> `✨️ Description:` It gives random insults. `🪀 Command:` locate<br> `✨️ Description:` It send your location. <br> `⚠️️ Warn:` Please open your location before using command! `🪀 Command:` logmsg<br> `✨️ Description:` Saves the message you reply to your private number. <br> `⚠️️ Warn:` Does not support animated stickers! `🪀 Command:` logomaker<br> `✨️ Description:` Shows logomaker tools with unlimited access. `🪀 Command:` meme <br> `✨️ Description:` Photo memes you replied to. `🪀 Command:` movie <br> `✨️ Description:` Shows movie info. `🪀 Command:` neko<br> `✨️ Description:` Replied messages will be added to nekobin.com. `🪀 Command:` song <br> `✨️ Description:` Uploads the song you wrote. `🪀 Command:` video <br> `✨️ Description:` Downloads video from YouTube. `🪀 Command:` fb <br> `✨️ Description:` Download video from facebook. `🪀 Command:` tiktok <br> `✨️ Description:` Download tiktok video. `🪀 Command:` notes<br> `✨️ Description:` Shows all your existing notes. `🪀 Command:` save <br> `✨️ Description:` Reply a message and type .save or just use .save <Your note> without replying `🪀 Command:` deleteNotes<br> `✨️ Description:` Deletes *all* your saved notes. `🪀 Command:` ocr <br> `✨️ Description:` Reads the text on the photo you have replied. `🪀 Command:` pinimg <br> `✨️ Description:` Downloas images from Pinterest. `🪀 Command:` playst <br> `✨️ Description:` Get app details from play store. `🪀 Command:` profile<br> `✨️ Description:` Profile menu. `🪀 Command:` getpp<br> `✨️ Description:` Get pofile picture. `🪀 Command:` setbio <br> `✨️ Description:` Set your about. `🪀 Command:` getbio<br> `✨️ Description:` Get user about. `🪀 Command:` archive<br> `✨️ Description:` Archive chat. `🪀 Command:` unarchive<br> `✨️ Description:` Unarchive chat. `🪀 Command:` pin<br> `✨️ Description:` Archive chat. `🪀 Command:` unpin<br> `✨️ Description:` Unarchive chat. `🪀 Command:` pp<br> `✨️ Description:` Makes the profile photo what photo you reply. `🪀 Command:` kickme<br> `✨️ Description:` It kicks you from the group you are using it in. `🪀 Command:` block <br> `✨️ Description:` Block user. `🪀 Command:` unblock <br> `✨️ Description:` Unblock user. `🪀 Command:` jid <br> `✨️ Description:` Giving user's JID. `🪀 Command:` rdmore <br> `✨️ Description:` Add readmore to your message >> Use # to get readmore. `🪀 Command:` removebg <br> `✨️ Description:` Removes the background of the photos. `🪀 Command:` report <br> `✨️ Description:` Sends reports to group admins. `🪀 Command:` roll<br> `✨️ Description:` Roll dice randomly. `🪀 Command:` scam <br> `✨️ Description:` Creates 5 minutes of fake actions. `🪀 Command:` scan <br> `✨️ Description:` Checks whether the entered number is registered on WhatApp. `🪀 Command:` trt<br> `✨️ Description:` It translates with Google Translate. You must reply any message. <br> `💡 Example:` .trt en si (From English to Sinhala) `🪀 Command:` antilink <br> `✨️ Description:` Activates the Antilink tool. <br> `💡 Example:` .antilink on / off `🪀 Command:` autobio <br> `✨️ Description:` Add live clock to your bio! <br> `💡 Example:` .autobio on / off `🪀 Command:` detectlang<br> `✨️ Description:` Guess the language of the replied message. `🪀 Command:` currency `🪀 Command:` tts <br> `✨️ Description:` It converts text to sound. `🪀 Command:` music <br> `✨️ Description:` Uploads the song you wrote. `🪀 Command:` smp3 <br> `✨️ Description:` Get song as a mp3 documet file `🪀 Command:` mp4 <br> `✨️ Description:` Downloads video from YouTube. `🪀 Command:` yt <br> `✨️ Description:` It searchs on YouTube. `🪀 Command:` wiki <br> `✨️ Description:` Searches query on Wikipedia. `🪀 Command:` img <br> `✨️ Description:` Searches for related pics on Google. `🪀 Command:` lyric <br> `✨️ Description:` Finds the lyrics of the song. `🪀 Command:` covid <br> `✨️ Description:` Shows the daily and overall covid table of more than 15 countries. `🪀 Command:` ss <br> `✨️ Description:` Takes a screenshot from the page in the given link. `🪀 Command:` simi <br> `✨️ Description:` Are you bored? ... Fool around with SimSimi. ... World first popular Chatbot for daily conversation. `🪀 Command:` spdf <br> `✨️ Description:` Site to pdf file. `🪀 Command:` insta <br> `✨️ Description:` Downloads videos or photos from Instagram. `🪀 Command:` animesay <br> `✨️ Description:` It writes the text inside the banner the anime girl is holding `🪀 Command:` changesay <br> `✨️ Description:` Turns the text into the change my mind poster. `🪀 Command:` trumpsay <br> `✨️ Description:` Converts the text to Trump's tweet. `🪀 Command:` audio spam<br> `✨️ Description:` Sends the replied audio as spam. `🪀 Command:` foto spam<br> `✨️ Description:` Sends the replied photo as spam. `🪀 Command:` sticker spam<br> `✨️ Description:` Convert the replied photo or video to sticker and send it as spam. `🪀 Command:` vid spam `🪀 Command:` killspam<br> `✨️ Description:` Stops spam command. `🪀 Command:` spam <br> `✨️ Description:` It spam until you stop it. ⌨️ Example: .spam test `🪀 Command:` spotify <br> `✨️ Description:` Get music details from spotify. `🪀 Command:` st<br> `✨️ Description:` It converts your replied photo or video to sticker. `🪀 Command:` sweather<br> `✨️ Description:` Gives you the weekly interpretations of space weather observations provided by the Space Weather Research Center (SWRC) for a p. `🪀 Command:` alive <br> `✨️ Description:` Does bot work? `🪀 Command:` sysd<br> `✨️ Description:` Shows the system properties. `🪀 Command:` tagadmin `🪀 Command:` tg <br> `✨️ Description:` Tags everyone in the group. `🪀 Command:` pmall<br> `✨️ Description:` Sends the replied message to all members in the group. `🪀 Command:` tblend <br> `✨️ Description:` Applies the selected TBlend effect to videos. `🪀 Command:` link<br> `✨️ Description:` The image you reply to uploads to telegra.ph and provides its link. `🪀 Command:` unvoice<br> `✨️ Description:` Converts audio to sound recording. `🪀 Command:` up<br> `✨️ Description:` Checks the update your bot. `🪀 Command:` up now<br> `✨️ Description:` It makes updates. `🪀 Command:` voicy<br> `✨️ Description:` It converts audio to text. `🪀 Command:` wp<br> `✨️ Description:` It sends high resolution wallpapers. `🪀 Command:` wame <br> `✨️ Description:` Get a link to the user chat. `🪀 Command:` weather <br> `✨️ Description:` Shows the weather. `🪀 Command:` speedtest <br> `✨️ Description:` Measures Download and Upload speed. <br> `💡 Example:` speedtest user // speedtest server `🪀 Command:` ping<br> `✨️ Description:` Measures your ping. `🪀 Command:` short <br> `✨️ Description:` Shorten the long link. `🪀 Command:` calc <br> `✨️ Description:` Performs simple math operations. `🪀 Command:` xapi<br> `✨️ Description:` Xteam API key info. `🪀 Command:` joke<br> `✨️ Description:` Send random jokes. `🪀 Command:` quote<br> `✨️ Description:` Send random quotes.

PDF based Chatbot using streamlit LangChain & OpenAI.

A local LLM chatbot with RAG for PDF input files

Langchain Chatbot with Multiple PDF Support using OpenAI and Hugging Face Models

Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, p. 1. Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 55. Definition of AI as the study of intelligent agents: Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998), which provides the version that is used in this article. These authors use the term "computational intelligence" as a synonym for artificial intelligence.[1] Russell & Norvig (2003) (who prefer the term "rational agent") and write "The whole-agent view is now widely accepted in the field".[2] Nilsson 1998 Legg & Hutter 2007 Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 2. McCorduck 2004, p. 204 Maloof, Mark. "Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction, p. 37" (PDF). georgetown.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 August 2018. "How AI Is Getting Groundbreaking Changes In Talent Management And HR Tech". Hackernoon. Archived from the original on 11 September 2019. Retrieved 14 February 2020. Schank, Roger C. (1991). "Where's the AI". AI magazine. Vol. 12 no. 4. p. 38. Russell & Norvig 2009. "AlphaGo – Google DeepMind". Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Allen, Gregory (April 2020). "Department of Defense Joint AI Center - Understanding AI Technology" (PDF). AI.mil - The official site of the Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 25 April 2020. Optimism of early AI: * Herbert Simon quote: Simon 1965, p. 96 quoted in Crevier 1993, p. 109. * Marvin Minsky quote: Minsky 1967, p. 2 quoted in Crevier 1993, p. 109. Boom of the 1980s: rise of expert systems, Fifth Generation Project, Alvey, MCC, SCI: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 426–441 * Crevier 1993, pp. 161–162,197–203, 211, 240 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 24 * NRC 1999, pp. 210–211 * Newquist 1994, pp. 235–248 First AI Winter, Mansfield Amendment, Lighthill report * Crevier 1993, pp. 115–117 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 22 * NRC 1999, pp. 212–213 * Howe 1994 * Newquist 1994, pp. 189–201 Second AI winter: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 430–435 * Crevier 1993, pp. 209–210 * NRC 1999, pp. 214–216 * Newquist 1994, pp. 301–318 AI becomes hugely successful in the early 21st century * Clark 2015 Pamela McCorduck (2004, p. 424) writes of "the rough shattering of AI in subfields—vision, natural language, decision theory, genetic algorithms, robotics ... and these with own sub-subfield—that would hardly have anything to say to each other." This list of intelligent traits is based on the topics covered by the major AI textbooks, including: * Russell & Norvig 2003 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998 * Nilsson 1998 Kolata 1982. Maker 2006. Biological intelligence vs. intelligence in general: Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 2–3, who make the analogy with aeronautical engineering. McCorduck 2004, pp. 100–101, who writes that there are "two major branches of artificial intelligence: one aimed at producing intelligent behavior regardless of how it was accomplished, and the other aimed at modeling intelligent processes found in nature, particularly human ones." Kolata 1982, a paper in Science, which describes McCarthy's indifference to biological models. Kolata quotes McCarthy as writing: "This is AI, so we don't care if it's psychologically real".[19] McCarthy recently reiterated his position at the AI@50 conference where he said "Artificial intelligence is not, by definition, simulation of human intelligence".[20]. Neats vs. scruffies: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 421–424, 486–489 * Crevier 1993, p. 168 * Nilsson 1983, pp. 10–11 Symbolic vs. sub-symbolic AI: * Nilsson (1998, p. 7), who uses the term "sub-symbolic". General intelligence (strong AI) is discussed in popular introductions to AI: * Kurzweil 1999 and Kurzweil 2005 See the Dartmouth proposal, under Philosophy, below. McCorduck 2004, p. 34. McCorduck 2004, p. xviii. McCorduck 2004, p. 3. McCorduck 2004, pp. 340–400. This is a central idea of Pamela McCorduck's Machines Who Think. She writes: "I like to think of artificial intelligence as the scientific apotheosis of a venerable cultural tradition."[26] "Artificial intelligence in one form or another is an idea that has pervaded Western intellectual history, a dream in urgent need of being realized."[27] "Our history is full of attempts—nutty, eerie, comical, earnest, legendary and real—to make artificial intelligences, to reproduce what is the essential us—bypassing the ordinary means. Back and forth between myth and reality, our imaginations supplying what our workshops couldn't, we have engaged for a long time in this odd form of self-reproduction."[28] She traces the desire back to its Hellenistic roots and calls it the urge to "forge the Gods."[29] "Stephen Hawking believes AI could be mankind's last accomplishment". BetaNews. 21 October 2016. Archived from the original on 28 August 2017. Lombardo P, Boehm I, Nairz K (2020). "RadioComics – Santa Claus and the future of radiology". Eur J Radiol. 122 (1): 108771. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108771. PMID 31835078. Ford, Martin; Colvin, Geoff (6 September 2015). "Will robots create more jobs than they destroy?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2018. AI applications widely used behind the scenes: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 28 * Kurzweil 2005, p. 265 * NRC 1999, pp. 216–222 * Newquist 1994, pp. 189–201 AI in myth: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 4–5 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 939 AI in early science fiction. * McCorduck 2004, pp. 17–25 Formal reasoning: * Berlinski, David (2000). The Advent of the Algorithm. Harcourt Books. ISBN 978-0-15-601391-8. OCLC 46890682. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. Turing, Alan (1948), "Machine Intelligence", in Copeland, B. Jack (ed.), The Essential Turing: The ideas that gave birth to the computer age, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 412, ISBN 978-0-19-825080-7 Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 16. Dartmouth conference: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 111–136 * Crevier 1993, pp. 47–49, who writes "the conference is generally recognized as the official birthdate of the new science." * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 17, who call the conference "the birth of artificial intelligence." * NRC 1999, pp. 200–201 McCarthy, John (1988). "Review of The Question of Artificial Intelligence". Annals of the History of Computing. 10 (3): 224–229., collected in McCarthy, John (1996). "10. Review of The Question of Artificial Intelligence". Defending AI Research: A Collection of Essays and Reviews. CSLI., p. 73, "[O]ne of the reasons for inventing the term "artificial intelligence" was to escape association with "cybernetics". Its concentration on analog feedback seemed misguided, and I wished to avoid having either to accept Norbert (not Robert) Wiener as a guru or having to argue with him." Hegemony of the Dartmouth conference attendees: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 17, who write "for the next 20 years the field would be dominated by these people and their students." * McCorduck 2004, pp. 129–130 Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 18. Schaeffer J. (2009) Didn't Samuel Solve That Game?. In: One Jump Ahead. Springer, Boston, MA Samuel, A. L. (July 1959). "Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers". IBM Journal of Research and Development. 3 (3): 210–229. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.368.2254. doi:10.1147/rd.33.0210. "Golden years" of AI (successful symbolic reasoning programs 1956–1973): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 243–252 * Crevier 1993, pp. 52–107 * Moravec 1988, p. 9 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 18–21 The programs described are Arthur Samuel's checkers program for the IBM 701, Daniel Bobrow's STUDENT, Newell and Simon's Logic Theorist and Terry Winograd's SHRDLU. DARPA pours money into undirected pure research into AI during the 1960s: * McCorduck 2004, p. 131 * Crevier 1993, pp. 51, 64–65 * NRC 1999, pp. 204–205 AI in England: * Howe 1994 Lighthill 1973. Expert systems: * ACM 1998, I.2.1 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 22–24 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 227–331 * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 17.4 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 327–335, 434–435 * Crevier 1993, pp. 145–62, 197–203 * Newquist 1994, pp. 155–183 Mead, Carver A.; Ismail, Mohammed (8 May 1989). Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems (PDF). The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. 80. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1639-8. ISBN 978-1-4613-1639-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020. Formal methods are now preferred ("Victory of the neats"): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 25–26 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 486–487 McCorduck 2004, pp. 480–483. Markoff 2011. "Ask the AI experts: What's driving today's progress in AI?". McKinsey & Company. Archived from the original on 13 April 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2018. Administrator. "Kinect's AI breakthrough explained". i-programmer.info. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Rowinski, Dan (15 January 2013). "Virtual Personal Assistants & The Future Of Your Smartphone [Infographic]". ReadWrite. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. "Artificial intelligence: Google's AlphaGo beats Go master Lee Se-dol". BBC News. 12 March 2016. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2016. Metz, Cade (27 May 2017). "After Win in China, AlphaGo's Designers Explore New AI". Wired. Archived from the original on 2 June 2017. "World's Go Player Ratings". May 2017. Archived from the original on 1 April 2017. "柯洁迎19岁生日 雄踞人类世界排名第一已两年" (in Chinese). May 2017. Archived from the original on 11 August 2017. Clark, Jack (8 December 2015). "Why 2015 Was a Breakthrough Year in Artificial Intelligence". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 23 November 2016. Retrieved 23 November 2016. After a half-decade of quiet breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, 2015 has been a landmark year. Computers are smarter and learning faster than ever. "Reshaping Business With Artificial Intelligence". MIT Sloan Management Review. Archived from the original on 19 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018. Lorica, Ben (18 December 2017). "The state of AI adoption". O'Reilly Media. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018. Allen, Gregory (6 February 2019). "Understanding China's AI Strategy". Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 17 March 2019. "Review | How two AI superpowers – the U.S. and China – battle for supremacy in the field". Washington Post. 2 November 2018. Archived from the original on 4 November 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2018. at 10:11, Alistair Dabbs 22 Feb 2019. "Artificial Intelligence: You know it isn't real, yeah?". www.theregister.co.uk. Archived from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. "Stop Calling it Artificial Intelligence". Archived from the original on 2 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. "AI isn't taking over the world – it doesn't exist yet". GBG Global website. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. Kaplan, Andreas; Haenlein, Michael (1 January 2019). "Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence". Business Horizons. 62 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004. Domingos 2015, Chapter 5. Domingos 2015, Chapter 7. Lindenbaum, M., Markovitch, S., & Rusakov, D. (2004). Selective sampling for nearest neighbor classifiers. Machine learning, 54(2), 125–152. Domingos 2015, Chapter 1. Intractability and efficiency and the combinatorial explosion: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 9, 21–22 Domingos 2015, Chapter 2, Chapter 3. Hart, P. E.; Nilsson, N. J.; Raphael, B. (1972). "Correction to "A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths"". SIGART Newsletter (37): 28–29. doi:10.1145/1056777.1056779. S2CID 6386648. Domingos 2015, Chapter 2, Chapter 4, Chapter 6. "Can neural network computers learn from experience, and if so, could they ever become what we would call 'smart'?". Scientific American. 2018. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Domingos 2015, Chapter 6, Chapter 7. Domingos 2015, p. 286. "Single pixel change fools AI programs". BBC News. 3 November 2017. Archived from the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018. "AI Has a Hallucination Problem That's Proving Tough to Fix". WIRED. 2018. Archived from the original on 12 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018. Matti, D.; Ekenel, H. K.; Thiran, J. P. (2017). Combining LiDAR space clustering and convolutional neural networks for pedestrian detection. 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). pp. 1–6. arXiv:1710.06160. doi:10.1109/AVSS.2017.8078512. ISBN 978-1-5386-2939-0. S2CID 2401976. Ferguson, Sarah; Luders, Brandon; Grande, Robert C.; How, Jonathan P. (2015). Real-Time Predictive Modeling and Robust Avoidance of Pedestrians with Uncertain, Changing Intentions. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XI. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. 107. Springer, Cham. pp. 161–177. arXiv:1405.5581. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16595-0_10. ISBN 978-3-319-16594-3. S2CID 8681101. "Cultivating Common Sense | DiscoverMagazine.com". Discover Magazine. 2017. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Davis, Ernest; Marcus, Gary (24 August 2015). "Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence". Communications of the ACM. 58 (9): 92–103. doi:10.1145/2701413. S2CID 13583137. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 6 April 2020. Winograd, Terry (January 1972). "Understanding natural language". Cognitive Psychology. 3 (1): 1–191. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3. "Don't worry: Autonomous cars aren't coming tomorrow (or next year)". Autoweek. 2016. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Knight, Will (2017). "Boston may be famous for bad drivers, but it's the testing ground for a smarter self-driving car". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2018. Prakken, Henry (31 August 2017). "On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law". Artificial Intelligence and Law. 25 (3): 341–363. doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9210-0. Lieto, Antonio (May 2018). "The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possible developments". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 39–55. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.001. hdl:2318/1665207. S2CID 206868967. Problem solving, puzzle solving, game playing and deduction: * Russell & Norvig 2003, chpt. 3–9, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, chpt. 2,3,7,9, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, chpt. 3,4,6,8, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 7–12 Uncertain reasoning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 452–644, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 345–395, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 333–381, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 19 Psychological evidence of sub-symbolic reasoning: * Wason & Shapiro (1966) showed that people do poorly on completely abstract problems, but if the problem is restated to allow the use of intuitive social intelligence, performance dramatically improves. (See Wason selection task) * Kahneman, Slovic & Tversky (1982) have shown that people are terrible at elementary problems that involve uncertain reasoning. (See list of cognitive biases for several examples). * Lakoff & Núñez (2000) have controversially argued that even our skills at mathematics depend on knowledge and skills that come from "the body", i.e. sensorimotor and perceptual skills. (See Where Mathematics Comes From) Knowledge representation: * ACM 1998, I.2.4, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 320–363, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 23–46, 69–81, 169–196, 235–277, 281–298, 319–345, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 227–243, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18 Knowledge engineering: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 260–266, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 199–233, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. ≈17.1–17.4 Representing categories and relations: Semantic networks, description logics, inheritance (including frames and scripts): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 349–354, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 174–177, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 248–258, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18.3 Representing events and time:Situation calculus, event calculus, fluent calculus (including solving the frame problem): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 328–341, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–298, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18.2 Causal calculus: * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 335–337 Representing knowledge about knowledge: Belief calculus, modal logics: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 341–344, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 275–277 Sikos, Leslie F. (June 2017). Description Logics in Multimedia Reasoning. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54066-5. ISBN 978-3-319-54066-5. S2CID 3180114. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Ontology: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 320–328 Smoliar, Stephen W.; Zhang, HongJiang (1994). "Content based video indexing and retrieval". IEEE Multimedia. 1 (2): 62–72. doi:10.1109/93.311653. S2CID 32710913. Neumann, Bernd; Möller, Ralf (January 2008). "On scene interpretation with description logics". Image and Vision Computing. 26 (1): 82–101. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2007.08.013. Kuperman, G. J.; Reichley, R. M.; Bailey, T. C. (1 July 2006). "Using Commercial Knowledge Bases for Clinical Decision Support: Opportunities, Hurdles, and Recommendations". Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 13 (4): 369–371. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2055. PMC 1513681. PMID 16622160. MCGARRY, KEN (1 December 2005). "A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery". The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1017/S0269888905000408. S2CID 14987656. Bertini, M; Del Bimbo, A; Torniai, C (2006). "Automatic annotation and semantic retrieval of video sequences using multimedia ontologies". MM '06 Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. Santa Barbara: ACM. pp. 679–682. Qualification problem: * McCarthy & Hayes 1969 * Russell & Norvig 2003[page needed] While McCarthy was primarily concerned with issues in the logical representation of actions, Russell & Norvig 2003 apply the term to the more general issue of default reasoning in the vast network of assumptions underlying all our commonsense knowledge. Default reasoning and default logic, non-monotonic logics, circumscription, closed world assumption, abduction (Poole et al. places abduction under "default reasoning". Luger et al. places this under "uncertain reasoning"): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 354–360, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 248–256, 323–335, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 335–363, * Nilsson 1998, ~18.3.3 Breadth of commonsense knowledge: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 21, * Crevier 1993, pp. 113–114, * Moravec 1988, p. 13, * Lenat & Guha 1989 (Introduction) Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986. Gladwell 2005. Expert knowledge as embodied intuition: * Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986 (Hubert Dreyfus is a philosopher and critic of AI who was among the first to argue that most useful human knowledge was encoded sub-symbolically. See Dreyfus' critique of AI) * Gladwell 2005 (Gladwell's Blink is a popular introduction to sub-symbolic reasoning and knowledge.) * Hawkins & Blakeslee 2005 (Hawkins argues that sub-symbolic knowledge should be the primary focus of AI research.) Planning: * ACM 1998, ~I.2.8, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 375–459, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–316, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 314–329, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 10.1–2, 22 Information value theory: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 600–604 Classical planning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 375–430, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–315, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 314–329, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 10.1–2, 22 Planning and acting in non-deterministic domains: conditional planning, execution monitoring, replanning and continuous planning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 430–449 Multi-agent planning and emergent behavior: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 449–455 Turing 1950. Solomonoff 1956. Alan Turing discussed the centrality of learning as early as 1950, in his classic paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence".[120] In 1956, at the original Dartmouth AI summer conference, Ray Solomonoff wrote a report on unsupervised probabilistic machine learning: "An Inductive Inference Machine".[121] This is a form of Tom Mitchell's widely quoted definition of machine learning: "A computer program is set to learn from an experience E with respect to some task T and some performance measure P if its performance on T as measured by P improves with experience E." Learning: * ACM 1998, I.2.6, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 649–788, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 397–438, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 385–542, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 3.3, 10.3, 17.5, 20 Jordan, M. I.; Mitchell, T. M. (16 July 2015). "Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects". Science. 349 (6245): 255–260. Bibcode:2015Sci...349..255J. doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415. PMID 26185243. S2CID 677218. Reinforcement learning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 763–788 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 442–449 Natural language processing: * ACM 1998, I.2.7 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 790–831 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 91–104 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 591–632 "Versatile question answering systems: seeing in synthesis" Archived 1 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Mittal et al., IJIIDS, 5(2), 119–142, 2011 Applications of natural language processing, including information retrieval (i.e. text mining) and machine translation: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 840–857, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 623–630 Cambria, Erik; White, Bebo (May 2014). "Jumping NLP Curves: A Review of Natural Language Processing Research [Review Article]". IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine. 9 (2): 48–57. doi:10.1109/MCI.2014.2307227. S2CID 206451986. Vincent, James (7 November 2019). "OpenAI has published the text-generating AI it said was too dangerous to share". The Verge. Archived from the original on 11 June 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020. Machine perception: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 537–581, 863–898 * Nilsson 1998, ~chpt. 6 Speech recognition: * ACM 1998, ~I.2.7 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 568–578 Object recognition: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 885–892 Computer vision: * ACM 1998, I.2.10 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 863–898 * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 6 Robotics: * ACM 1998, I.2.9, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 901–942, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 443–460 Moving and configuration space: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 916–932 Tecuci 2012. Robotic mapping (localization, etc): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 908–915 Cadena, Cesar; Carlone, Luca; Carrillo, Henry; Latif, Yasir; Scaramuzza, Davide; Neira, Jose; Reid, Ian; Leonard, John J. (December 2016). "Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 32 (6): 1309–1332. arXiv:1606.05830. Bibcode:2016arXiv160605830C. doi:10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754. S2CID 2596787. Moravec, Hans (1988). Mind Children. Harvard University Press. p. 15. Chan, Szu Ping (15 November 2015). "This is what will happen when robots take over the world". Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 23 April 2018. "IKEA furniture and the limits of AI". The Economist. 2018. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Kismet. Thompson, Derek (2018). "What Jobs Will the Robots Take?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Scassellati, Brian (2002). "Theory of mind for a humanoid robot". Autonomous Robots. 12 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1023/A:1013298507114. S2CID 1979315. Cao, Yongcan; Yu, Wenwu; Ren, Wei; Chen, Guanrong (February 2013). "An Overview of Recent Progress in the Study of Distributed Multi-Agent Coordination". IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 9 (1): 427–438. arXiv:1207.3231. doi:10.1109/TII.2012.2219061. S2CID 9588126. Thro 1993. Edelson 1991. Tao & Tan 2005. Poria, Soujanya; Cambria, Erik; Bajpai, Rajiv; Hussain, Amir (September 2017). "A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion". Information Fusion. 37: 98–125. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003. hdl:1893/25490. Emotion and affective computing: * Minsky 2006 Waddell, Kaveh (2018). "Chatbots Have Entered the Uncanny Valley". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Pennachin, C.; Goertzel, B. (2007). Contemporary Approaches to Artificial General Intelligence. Artificial General Intelligence. Cognitive Technologies. Cognitive Technologies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4_1. ISBN 978-3-540-23733-4. Roberts, Jacob (2016). "Thinking Machines: The Search for Artificial Intelligence". Distillations. Vol. 2 no. 2. pp. 14–23. Archived from the original on 19 August 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018. "The superhero of artificial intelligence: can this genius keep it in check?". the Guardian. 16 February 2016. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018. Mnih, Volodymyr; Kavukcuoglu, Koray; Silver, David; Rusu, Andrei A.; Veness, Joel; Bellemare, Marc G.; Graves, Alex; Riedmiller, Martin; Fidjeland, Andreas K.; Ostrovski, Georg; Petersen, Stig; Beattie, Charles; Sadik, Amir; Antonoglou, Ioannis; King, Helen; Kumaran, Dharshan; Wierstra, Daan; Legg, Shane; Hassabis, Demis (26 February 2015). "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning". Nature. 518 (7540): 529–533. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..529M. doi:10.1038/nature14236. PMID 25719670. S2CID 205242740. Sample, Ian (14 March 2017). "Google's DeepMind makes AI program that can learn like a human". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018. "From not working to neural networking". The Economist. 2016. Archived from the original on 31 December 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2018. Domingos 2015. Artificial brain arguments: AI requires a simulation of the operation of the human brain * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 957 * Crevier 1993, pp. 271 and 279 A few of the people who make some form of the argument: * Moravec 1988 * Kurzweil 2005, p. 262 * Hawkins & Blakeslee 2005 The most extreme form of this argument (the brain replacement scenario) was put forward by Clark Glymour in the mid-1970s and was touched on by Zenon Pylyshyn and John Searle in 1980. Goertzel, Ben; Lian, Ruiting; Arel, Itamar; de Garis, Hugo; Chen, Shuo (December 2010). "A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures". Neurocomputing. 74 (1–3): 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2010.08.012. Nilsson 1983, p. 10. Nils Nilsson writes: "Simply put, there is wide disagreement in the field about what AI is all about."[163] AI's immediate precursors: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 51–107 * Crevier 1993, pp. 27–32 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 15, 940 * Moravec 1988, p. 3 Haugeland 1985, pp. 112–117 The most dramatic case of sub-symbolic AI being pushed into the background was the devastating critique of perceptrons by Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert in 1969. See History of AI, AI winter, or Frank Rosenblatt. Cognitive simulation, Newell and Simon, AI at CMU (then called Carnegie Tech): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 139–179, 245–250, 322–323 (EPAM) * Crevier 1993, pp. 145–149 Soar (history): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 450–451 * Crevier 1993, pp. 258–263 McCarthy and AI research at SAIL and SRI International: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 251–259 * Crevier 1993 AI research at Edinburgh and in France, birth of Prolog: * Crevier 1993, pp. 193–196 * Howe 1994 AI at MIT under Marvin Minsky in the 1960s : * McCorduck 2004, pp. 259–305 * Crevier 1993, pp. 83–102, 163–176 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 19 Cyc: * McCorduck 2004, p. 489, who calls it "a determinedly scruffy enterprise" * Crevier 1993, pp. 239–243 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 363−365 * Lenat & Guha 1989 Knowledge revolution: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 266–276, 298–300, 314, 421 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 22–23 Frederick, Hayes-Roth; William, Murray; Leonard, Adelman. "Expert systems". AccessScience. doi:10.1036/1097-8542.248550. Embodied approaches to AI: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 454–462 * Brooks 1990 * Moravec 1988 Weng et al. 2001. Lungarella et al. 2003. Asada et al. 2009. Oudeyer 2010. Revival of connectionism: * Crevier 1993, pp. 214–215 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 25 Computational intelligence * IEEE Computational Intelligence Society Archived 9 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Hutson, Matthew (16 February 2018). "Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis". Science. pp. 725–726. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..725H. doi:10.1126/science.359.6377.725. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018. Norvig 2012. Langley 2011. Katz 2012. The intelligent agent paradigm: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 27, 32–58, 968–972 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 7–21 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 235–240 * Hutter 2005, pp. 125–126 The definition used in this article, in terms of goals, actions, perception and environment, is due to Russell & Norvig (2003). Other definitions also include knowledge and learning as additional criteria. Agent architectures, hybrid intelligent systems: * Russell & Norvig (2003, pp. 27, 932, 970–972) * Nilsson (1998, chpt. 25) Hierarchical control system: * Albus 2002 Lieto, Antonio; Lebiere, Christian; Oltramari, Alessandro (May 2018). "The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possibile developments". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 39–55. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.001. hdl:2318/1665207. S2CID 206868967. Lieto, Antonio; Bhatt, Mehul; Oltramari, Alessandro; Vernon, David (May 2018). "The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.08.003. hdl:2318/1665249. S2CID 36189683. Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 1. White Paper: On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2020. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 February 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020. CNN 2006. Using AI to predict flight delays Archived 20 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Ishti.org. N. Aletras; D. Tsarapatsanis; D. Preotiuc-Pietro; V. Lampos (2016). "Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective". PeerJ Computer Science. 2: e93. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.93. "The Economist Explains: Why firms are piling into artificial intelligence". The Economist. 31 March 2016. Archived from the original on 8 May 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2016. Lohr, Steve (28 February 2016). "The Promise of Artificial Intelligence Unfolds in Small Steps". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 February 2016. Retrieved 29 February 2016. Frangoul, Anmar (14 June 2019). "A Californian business is using A.I. to change the way we think about energy storage". CNBC. Archived from the original on 25 July 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2019. Wakefield, Jane (15 June 2016). "Social media 'outstrips TV' as news source for young people". BBC News. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Smith, Mark (22 July 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 25 July 2016. Brown, Eileen. "Half of Americans do not believe deepfake news could target them online". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2019. The Turing test: Turing's original publication: * Turing 1950 Historical influence and philosophical implications: * Haugeland 1985, pp. 6–9 * Crevier 1993, p. 24 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 70–71 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 2–3 and 948 Dartmouth proposal: * McCarthy et al. 1955 (the original proposal) * Crevier 1993, p. 49 (historical significance) The physical symbol systems hypothesis: * Newell & Simon 1976, p. 116 * McCorduck 2004, p. 153 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 18 Dreyfus 1992, p. 156. Dreyfus criticized the necessary condition of the physical symbol system hypothesis, which he called the "psychological assumption": "The mind can be viewed as a device operating on bits of information according to formal rules."[206] Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence: * Dreyfus 1972, Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986 * Crevier 1993, pp. 120–132 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 211–239 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 950–952, Gödel 1951: in this lecture, Kurt Gödel uses the incompleteness theorem to arrive at the following disjunction: (a) the human mind is not a consistent finite machine, or (b) there exist Diophantine equations for which it cannot decide whether solutions exist. Gödel finds (b) implausible, and thus seems to have believed the human mind was not equivalent to a finite machine, i.e., its power exceeded that of any finite machine. He recognized that this was only a conjecture, since one could never disprove (b). Yet he considered the disjunctive conclusion to be a "certain fact". The Mathematical Objection: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 949 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 448–449 Making the Mathematical Objection: * Lucas 1961 * Penrose 1989 Refuting Mathematical Objection: * Turing 1950 under "(2) The Mathematical Objection" * Hofstadter 1979 Background: * Gödel 1931, Church 1936, Kleene 1935, Turing 1937 Graham Oppy (20 January 2015). "Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2016. These Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments are, however, problematic, and there is wide consensus that they fail. Stuart J. Russell; Peter Norvig (2010). "26.1.2: Philosophical Foundations/Weak AI: Can Machines Act Intelligently?/The mathematical objection". Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-604259-4. even if we grant that computers have limitations on what they can prove, there is no evidence that humans are immune from those limitations. Mark Colyvan. An introduction to the philosophy of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2012. From 2.2.2, 'Philosophical significance of Gödel's incompleteness results': "The accepted wisdom (with which I concur) is that the Lucas-Penrose arguments fail." Iphofen, Ron; Kritikos, Mihalis (3 January 2019). "Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society". Contemporary Social Science: 1–15. doi:10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803. ISSN 2158-2041. "Ethical AI Learns Human Rights Framework". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 11 November 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2019. Crevier 1993, pp. 132–144. In the early 1970s, Kenneth Colby presented a version of Weizenbaum's ELIZA known as DOCTOR which he promoted as a serious therapeutic tool.[216] Joseph Weizenbaum's critique of AI: * Weizenbaum 1976 * Crevier 1993, pp. 132–144 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 356–373 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 961 Weizenbaum (the AI researcher who developed the first chatterbot program, ELIZA) argued in 1976 that the misuse of artificial intelligence has the potential to devalue human life. Wendell Wallach (2010). Moral Machines, Oxford University Press. Wallach, pp 37–54. Wallach, pp 55–73. Wallach, Introduction chapter. Michael Anderson and Susan Leigh Anderson (2011), Machine Ethics, Cambridge University Press. "Machine Ethics". aaai.org. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Rubin, Charles (Spring 2003). "Artificial Intelligence and Human Nature". The New Atlantis. 1: 88–100. Archived from the original on 11 June 2012. Brooks, Rodney (10 November 2014). "artificial intelligence is a tool, not a threat". Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. "Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates Warn About Artificial Intelligence". Observer. 19 August 2015. Archived from the original on 30 October 2015. Retrieved 30 October 2015. Chalmers, David (1995). "Facing up to the problem of consciousness". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2 (3): 200–219. Archived from the original on 8 March 2005. Retrieved 11 October 2018. See also this link Archived 8 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine Horst, Steven, (2005) "The Computational Theory of Mind" Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Searle 1980, p. 1. This version is from Searle (1999), and is also quoted in Dennett 1991, p. 435. Searle's original formulation was "The appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states." [230] Strong AI is defined similarly by Russell & Norvig (2003, p. 947): "The assertion that machines could possibly act intelligently

(RAG) Developing a chatbot capable of utilizing PDF files as a knowledge base to answer questions. Additionally, we employed the vision capability of GPT-4V to identify and describe graphs from each page. Describing the charts and their illustrated trends improves the chatbot's accuracy in answering and providing additional context.

AL Airways Smart Assistant is a Retrieval-Augmented NLP chatbot developed using a self-created airline dataset. It answers passenger queries by retrieving information from custom policy PDFs and generating accurate, human-like responses.

No description available

A simple local Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) chatbot that can answer to questions by acquiring information from personal PDF documents.

Chat with your PDF files using LlamaIndex, Astra DB (Apache Cassandra), and Gradient's open-source models, including LLama2 and Streamlit, all designed for seamless interaction with PDF files.

Llama2-Medical-Chatbot is a medical chatbot that uses the Llama-2-7B-Chat-GGML model and the pdf The Gale Encyclopedia of Medicine, Volume 1, 2nd Edition. It is still under development, but it has the potential to be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare professionals, and researchers.

No description available

Teach a chatbot to be a bookworm with Langchain and OpenAI's GPT-3.5 language model. Get answers to all your burning questions straight from the pages of a PDF!

An AI-powered chatbot that leverages RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) to answer your questions based on the content of uploaded PDFs

An interactive AI chatbot for querying and discussing the contents of PDF documents using Streamlit and OpenAI/other AI language models.

This is a fun Python project that allows you to chat with a chatbot about the PDF you uploaded. and generate a PDF transcript of the conversation. The project is built using Python and Streamlit framework.