Found 1,701 repositories(showing 30)
sunilkumarmaurya786693
# Intelligence traffic monitoring system ### About Due to a huge number of vehicles ,very busy road and parking which may not be possible manually as a human being, tends to get fatigued due to monotonous nature of the job and they cannot keep track of the vehicles when there are multiple vehicles are passing in a very short time. So modern cities need to establish effective automatic systems for traffic management and scheduling. The objective of this project is to design and develop an accurate and automatic number plate recognition system, Automatic traffic light control using google Api live traffic density data, smart fine system and also We can track the lost vehicle using vehicle number plate detection and find its location by google Map API. Intelligent Traffic Monitoring System (ITMS) is an image processing and machine learning technology to identify vehicles by their license plates and we uses the microService of google API for live traffic density. ### Features 1. License plate number recognition. 2. Matching the plate number with Database. 3. Intelligence traffic light control using live traffic density data. 4. Show traffic density of particular area for some duration of month in form of graph. 5. Online Vehicle license registration. 6. Smart fine system. ###Applications 1. Automated track the location of stolen vehicle 2. Anti-Theft/ Vehicle detection. 3. Traffic light automation ,no requirement of Traffic police. 4. Smart fine /E Challan Systems. 5. Car Parking / Automatic Toll Deduction. 6. Law Enforcement 7. VIP/Ambulance path Clearance 8. Help the government to take ● Increase the efficiency of existing transport infrastructure ● Develop a license plate recognition system, ● Build a smart fine system and in future enhancement automated fine systems for vehicles. ● Live Traffic detection system and automated traffic light control system. ● Predict the traffic density using machine learning for specific areas by its previous data. ● Automated lost vehicle detection system and information to administration. ● Handle traffic congestion using automated light control system. ### Installation * Clone the project. * Run `yarn install` to install the dependencies. * Run `yarn start` to view the project in action. ### OpenCV Demo to Count Vehicles * In "countingCars" directory, run 'python count.py' . ### License plate detection go to vehicle_number_by_its_pate folder and type python3 licenseplateDetection.py 1.jpg #secreenshot <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103735.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103751.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103811.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103826.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103844.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103906.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_103943.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_104003.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200901_104044.jpg"> <img src="./screenshot/IMG_20200902_032314.jpg">
Aryia-Behroziuan
Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, p. 1. Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 55. Definition of AI as the study of intelligent agents: Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998), which provides the version that is used in this article. These authors use the term "computational intelligence" as a synonym for artificial intelligence.[1] Russell & Norvig (2003) (who prefer the term "rational agent") and write "The whole-agent view is now widely accepted in the field".[2] Nilsson 1998 Legg & Hutter 2007 Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 2. McCorduck 2004, p. 204 Maloof, Mark. "Artificial Intelligence: An Introduction, p. 37" (PDF). georgetown.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 August 2018. "How AI Is Getting Groundbreaking Changes In Talent Management And HR Tech". Hackernoon. Archived from the original on 11 September 2019. Retrieved 14 February 2020. Schank, Roger C. (1991). "Where's the AI". AI magazine. Vol. 12 no. 4. p. 38. Russell & Norvig 2009. "AlphaGo – Google DeepMind". Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Allen, Gregory (April 2020). "Department of Defense Joint AI Center - Understanding AI Technology" (PDF). AI.mil - The official site of the Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 25 April 2020. Optimism of early AI: * Herbert Simon quote: Simon 1965, p. 96 quoted in Crevier 1993, p. 109. * Marvin Minsky quote: Minsky 1967, p. 2 quoted in Crevier 1993, p. 109. Boom of the 1980s: rise of expert systems, Fifth Generation Project, Alvey, MCC, SCI: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 426–441 * Crevier 1993, pp. 161–162,197–203, 211, 240 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 24 * NRC 1999, pp. 210–211 * Newquist 1994, pp. 235–248 First AI Winter, Mansfield Amendment, Lighthill report * Crevier 1993, pp. 115–117 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 22 * NRC 1999, pp. 212–213 * Howe 1994 * Newquist 1994, pp. 189–201 Second AI winter: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 430–435 * Crevier 1993, pp. 209–210 * NRC 1999, pp. 214–216 * Newquist 1994, pp. 301–318 AI becomes hugely successful in the early 21st century * Clark 2015 Pamela McCorduck (2004, p. 424) writes of "the rough shattering of AI in subfields—vision, natural language, decision theory, genetic algorithms, robotics ... and these with own sub-subfield—that would hardly have anything to say to each other." This list of intelligent traits is based on the topics covered by the major AI textbooks, including: * Russell & Norvig 2003 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998 * Nilsson 1998 Kolata 1982. Maker 2006. Biological intelligence vs. intelligence in general: Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 2–3, who make the analogy with aeronautical engineering. McCorduck 2004, pp. 100–101, who writes that there are "two major branches of artificial intelligence: one aimed at producing intelligent behavior regardless of how it was accomplished, and the other aimed at modeling intelligent processes found in nature, particularly human ones." Kolata 1982, a paper in Science, which describes McCarthy's indifference to biological models. Kolata quotes McCarthy as writing: "This is AI, so we don't care if it's psychologically real".[19] McCarthy recently reiterated his position at the AI@50 conference where he said "Artificial intelligence is not, by definition, simulation of human intelligence".[20]. Neats vs. scruffies: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 421–424, 486–489 * Crevier 1993, p. 168 * Nilsson 1983, pp. 10–11 Symbolic vs. sub-symbolic AI: * Nilsson (1998, p. 7), who uses the term "sub-symbolic". General intelligence (strong AI) is discussed in popular introductions to AI: * Kurzweil 1999 and Kurzweil 2005 See the Dartmouth proposal, under Philosophy, below. McCorduck 2004, p. 34. McCorduck 2004, p. xviii. McCorduck 2004, p. 3. McCorduck 2004, pp. 340–400. This is a central idea of Pamela McCorduck's Machines Who Think. She writes: "I like to think of artificial intelligence as the scientific apotheosis of a venerable cultural tradition."[26] "Artificial intelligence in one form or another is an idea that has pervaded Western intellectual history, a dream in urgent need of being realized."[27] "Our history is full of attempts—nutty, eerie, comical, earnest, legendary and real—to make artificial intelligences, to reproduce what is the essential us—bypassing the ordinary means. Back and forth between myth and reality, our imaginations supplying what our workshops couldn't, we have engaged for a long time in this odd form of self-reproduction."[28] She traces the desire back to its Hellenistic roots and calls it the urge to "forge the Gods."[29] "Stephen Hawking believes AI could be mankind's last accomplishment". BetaNews. 21 October 2016. Archived from the original on 28 August 2017. Lombardo P, Boehm I, Nairz K (2020). "RadioComics – Santa Claus and the future of radiology". Eur J Radiol. 122 (1): 108771. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108771. PMID 31835078. Ford, Martin; Colvin, Geoff (6 September 2015). "Will robots create more jobs than they destroy?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2018. AI applications widely used behind the scenes: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 28 * Kurzweil 2005, p. 265 * NRC 1999, pp. 216–222 * Newquist 1994, pp. 189–201 AI in myth: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 4–5 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 939 AI in early science fiction. * McCorduck 2004, pp. 17–25 Formal reasoning: * Berlinski, David (2000). The Advent of the Algorithm. Harcourt Books. ISBN 978-0-15-601391-8. OCLC 46890682. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. Turing, Alan (1948), "Machine Intelligence", in Copeland, B. Jack (ed.), The Essential Turing: The ideas that gave birth to the computer age, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 412, ISBN 978-0-19-825080-7 Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 16. Dartmouth conference: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 111–136 * Crevier 1993, pp. 47–49, who writes "the conference is generally recognized as the official birthdate of the new science." * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 17, who call the conference "the birth of artificial intelligence." * NRC 1999, pp. 200–201 McCarthy, John (1988). "Review of The Question of Artificial Intelligence". Annals of the History of Computing. 10 (3): 224–229., collected in McCarthy, John (1996). "10. Review of The Question of Artificial Intelligence". Defending AI Research: A Collection of Essays and Reviews. CSLI., p. 73, "[O]ne of the reasons for inventing the term "artificial intelligence" was to escape association with "cybernetics". Its concentration on analog feedback seemed misguided, and I wished to avoid having either to accept Norbert (not Robert) Wiener as a guru or having to argue with him." Hegemony of the Dartmouth conference attendees: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 17, who write "for the next 20 years the field would be dominated by these people and their students." * McCorduck 2004, pp. 129–130 Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 18. Schaeffer J. (2009) Didn't Samuel Solve That Game?. In: One Jump Ahead. Springer, Boston, MA Samuel, A. L. (July 1959). "Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers". IBM Journal of Research and Development. 3 (3): 210–229. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.368.2254. doi:10.1147/rd.33.0210. "Golden years" of AI (successful symbolic reasoning programs 1956–1973): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 243–252 * Crevier 1993, pp. 52–107 * Moravec 1988, p. 9 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 18–21 The programs described are Arthur Samuel's checkers program for the IBM 701, Daniel Bobrow's STUDENT, Newell and Simon's Logic Theorist and Terry Winograd's SHRDLU. DARPA pours money into undirected pure research into AI during the 1960s: * McCorduck 2004, p. 131 * Crevier 1993, pp. 51, 64–65 * NRC 1999, pp. 204–205 AI in England: * Howe 1994 Lighthill 1973. Expert systems: * ACM 1998, I.2.1 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 22–24 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 227–331 * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 17.4 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 327–335, 434–435 * Crevier 1993, pp. 145–62, 197–203 * Newquist 1994, pp. 155–183 Mead, Carver A.; Ismail, Mohammed (8 May 1989). Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems (PDF). The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. 80. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1639-8. ISBN 978-1-4613-1639-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020. Formal methods are now preferred ("Victory of the neats"): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 25–26 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 486–487 McCorduck 2004, pp. 480–483. Markoff 2011. "Ask the AI experts: What's driving today's progress in AI?". McKinsey & Company. Archived from the original on 13 April 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2018. Administrator. "Kinect's AI breakthrough explained". i-programmer.info. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Rowinski, Dan (15 January 2013). "Virtual Personal Assistants & The Future Of Your Smartphone [Infographic]". ReadWrite. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. "Artificial intelligence: Google's AlphaGo beats Go master Lee Se-dol". BBC News. 12 March 2016. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2016. Metz, Cade (27 May 2017). "After Win in China, AlphaGo's Designers Explore New AI". Wired. Archived from the original on 2 June 2017. "World's Go Player Ratings". May 2017. Archived from the original on 1 April 2017. "柯洁迎19岁生日 雄踞人类世界排名第一已两年" (in Chinese). May 2017. Archived from the original on 11 August 2017. Clark, Jack (8 December 2015). "Why 2015 Was a Breakthrough Year in Artificial Intelligence". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 23 November 2016. Retrieved 23 November 2016. After a half-decade of quiet breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, 2015 has been a landmark year. Computers are smarter and learning faster than ever. "Reshaping Business With Artificial Intelligence". MIT Sloan Management Review. Archived from the original on 19 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018. Lorica, Ben (18 December 2017). "The state of AI adoption". O'Reilly Media. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2018. Allen, Gregory (6 February 2019). "Understanding China's AI Strategy". Center for a New American Security. Archived from the original on 17 March 2019. "Review | How two AI superpowers – the U.S. and China – battle for supremacy in the field". Washington Post. 2 November 2018. Archived from the original on 4 November 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2018. at 10:11, Alistair Dabbs 22 Feb 2019. "Artificial Intelligence: You know it isn't real, yeah?". www.theregister.co.uk. Archived from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. "Stop Calling it Artificial Intelligence". Archived from the original on 2 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. "AI isn't taking over the world – it doesn't exist yet". GBG Global website. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2020. Kaplan, Andreas; Haenlein, Michael (1 January 2019). "Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence". Business Horizons. 62 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004. Domingos 2015, Chapter 5. Domingos 2015, Chapter 7. Lindenbaum, M., Markovitch, S., & Rusakov, D. (2004). Selective sampling for nearest neighbor classifiers. Machine learning, 54(2), 125–152. Domingos 2015, Chapter 1. Intractability and efficiency and the combinatorial explosion: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 9, 21–22 Domingos 2015, Chapter 2, Chapter 3. Hart, P. E.; Nilsson, N. J.; Raphael, B. (1972). "Correction to "A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths"". SIGART Newsletter (37): 28–29. doi:10.1145/1056777.1056779. S2CID 6386648. Domingos 2015, Chapter 2, Chapter 4, Chapter 6. "Can neural network computers learn from experience, and if so, could they ever become what we would call 'smart'?". Scientific American. 2018. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Domingos 2015, Chapter 6, Chapter 7. Domingos 2015, p. 286. "Single pixel change fools AI programs". BBC News. 3 November 2017. Archived from the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018. "AI Has a Hallucination Problem That's Proving Tough to Fix". WIRED. 2018. Archived from the original on 12 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018. Matti, D.; Ekenel, H. K.; Thiran, J. P. (2017). Combining LiDAR space clustering and convolutional neural networks for pedestrian detection. 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). pp. 1–6. arXiv:1710.06160. doi:10.1109/AVSS.2017.8078512. ISBN 978-1-5386-2939-0. S2CID 2401976. Ferguson, Sarah; Luders, Brandon; Grande, Robert C.; How, Jonathan P. (2015). Real-Time Predictive Modeling and Robust Avoidance of Pedestrians with Uncertain, Changing Intentions. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XI. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. 107. Springer, Cham. pp. 161–177. arXiv:1405.5581. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16595-0_10. ISBN 978-3-319-16594-3. S2CID 8681101. "Cultivating Common Sense | DiscoverMagazine.com". Discover Magazine. 2017. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Davis, Ernest; Marcus, Gary (24 August 2015). "Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence". Communications of the ACM. 58 (9): 92–103. doi:10.1145/2701413. S2CID 13583137. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 6 April 2020. Winograd, Terry (January 1972). "Understanding natural language". Cognitive Psychology. 3 (1): 1–191. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3. "Don't worry: Autonomous cars aren't coming tomorrow (or next year)". Autoweek. 2016. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018. Knight, Will (2017). "Boston may be famous for bad drivers, but it's the testing ground for a smarter self-driving car". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2018. Prakken, Henry (31 August 2017). "On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law". Artificial Intelligence and Law. 25 (3): 341–363. doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9210-0. Lieto, Antonio (May 2018). "The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possible developments". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 39–55. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.001. hdl:2318/1665207. S2CID 206868967. Problem solving, puzzle solving, game playing and deduction: * Russell & Norvig 2003, chpt. 3–9, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, chpt. 2,3,7,9, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, chpt. 3,4,6,8, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 7–12 Uncertain reasoning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 452–644, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 345–395, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 333–381, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 19 Psychological evidence of sub-symbolic reasoning: * Wason & Shapiro (1966) showed that people do poorly on completely abstract problems, but if the problem is restated to allow the use of intuitive social intelligence, performance dramatically improves. (See Wason selection task) * Kahneman, Slovic & Tversky (1982) have shown that people are terrible at elementary problems that involve uncertain reasoning. (See list of cognitive biases for several examples). * Lakoff & Núñez (2000) have controversially argued that even our skills at mathematics depend on knowledge and skills that come from "the body", i.e. sensorimotor and perceptual skills. (See Where Mathematics Comes From) Knowledge representation: * ACM 1998, I.2.4, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 320–363, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 23–46, 69–81, 169–196, 235–277, 281–298, 319–345, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 227–243, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18 Knowledge engineering: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 260–266, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 199–233, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. ≈17.1–17.4 Representing categories and relations: Semantic networks, description logics, inheritance (including frames and scripts): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 349–354, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 174–177, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 248–258, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18.3 Representing events and time:Situation calculus, event calculus, fluent calculus (including solving the frame problem): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 328–341, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–298, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 18.2 Causal calculus: * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 335–337 Representing knowledge about knowledge: Belief calculus, modal logics: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 341–344, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 275–277 Sikos, Leslie F. (June 2017). Description Logics in Multimedia Reasoning. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54066-5. ISBN 978-3-319-54066-5. S2CID 3180114. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Ontology: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 320–328 Smoliar, Stephen W.; Zhang, HongJiang (1994). "Content based video indexing and retrieval". IEEE Multimedia. 1 (2): 62–72. doi:10.1109/93.311653. S2CID 32710913. Neumann, Bernd; Möller, Ralf (January 2008). "On scene interpretation with description logics". Image and Vision Computing. 26 (1): 82–101. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2007.08.013. Kuperman, G. J.; Reichley, R. M.; Bailey, T. C. (1 July 2006). "Using Commercial Knowledge Bases for Clinical Decision Support: Opportunities, Hurdles, and Recommendations". Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 13 (4): 369–371. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2055. PMC 1513681. PMID 16622160. MCGARRY, KEN (1 December 2005). "A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery". The Knowledge Engineering Review. 20 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1017/S0269888905000408. S2CID 14987656. Bertini, M; Del Bimbo, A; Torniai, C (2006). "Automatic annotation and semantic retrieval of video sequences using multimedia ontologies". MM '06 Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. Santa Barbara: ACM. pp. 679–682. Qualification problem: * McCarthy & Hayes 1969 * Russell & Norvig 2003[page needed] While McCarthy was primarily concerned with issues in the logical representation of actions, Russell & Norvig 2003 apply the term to the more general issue of default reasoning in the vast network of assumptions underlying all our commonsense knowledge. Default reasoning and default logic, non-monotonic logics, circumscription, closed world assumption, abduction (Poole et al. places abduction under "default reasoning". Luger et al. places this under "uncertain reasoning"): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 354–360, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 248–256, 323–335, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 335–363, * Nilsson 1998, ~18.3.3 Breadth of commonsense knowledge: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 21, * Crevier 1993, pp. 113–114, * Moravec 1988, p. 13, * Lenat & Guha 1989 (Introduction) Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986. Gladwell 2005. Expert knowledge as embodied intuition: * Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986 (Hubert Dreyfus is a philosopher and critic of AI who was among the first to argue that most useful human knowledge was encoded sub-symbolically. See Dreyfus' critique of AI) * Gladwell 2005 (Gladwell's Blink is a popular introduction to sub-symbolic reasoning and knowledge.) * Hawkins & Blakeslee 2005 (Hawkins argues that sub-symbolic knowledge should be the primary focus of AI research.) Planning: * ACM 1998, ~I.2.8, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 375–459, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–316, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 314–329, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 10.1–2, 22 Information value theory: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 600–604 Classical planning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 375–430, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 281–315, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 314–329, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 10.1–2, 22 Planning and acting in non-deterministic domains: conditional planning, execution monitoring, replanning and continuous planning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 430–449 Multi-agent planning and emergent behavior: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 449–455 Turing 1950. Solomonoff 1956. Alan Turing discussed the centrality of learning as early as 1950, in his classic paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence".[120] In 1956, at the original Dartmouth AI summer conference, Ray Solomonoff wrote a report on unsupervised probabilistic machine learning: "An Inductive Inference Machine".[121] This is a form of Tom Mitchell's widely quoted definition of machine learning: "A computer program is set to learn from an experience E with respect to some task T and some performance measure P if its performance on T as measured by P improves with experience E." Learning: * ACM 1998, I.2.6, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 649–788, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 397–438, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 385–542, * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 3.3, 10.3, 17.5, 20 Jordan, M. I.; Mitchell, T. M. (16 July 2015). "Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects". Science. 349 (6245): 255–260. Bibcode:2015Sci...349..255J. doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415. PMID 26185243. S2CID 677218. Reinforcement learning: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 763–788 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 442–449 Natural language processing: * ACM 1998, I.2.7 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 790–831 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 91–104 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 591–632 "Versatile question answering systems: seeing in synthesis" Archived 1 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Mittal et al., IJIIDS, 5(2), 119–142, 2011 Applications of natural language processing, including information retrieval (i.e. text mining) and machine translation: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 840–857, * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 623–630 Cambria, Erik; White, Bebo (May 2014). "Jumping NLP Curves: A Review of Natural Language Processing Research [Review Article]". IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine. 9 (2): 48–57. doi:10.1109/MCI.2014.2307227. S2CID 206451986. Vincent, James (7 November 2019). "OpenAI has published the text-generating AI it said was too dangerous to share". The Verge. Archived from the original on 11 June 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2020. Machine perception: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 537–581, 863–898 * Nilsson 1998, ~chpt. 6 Speech recognition: * ACM 1998, ~I.2.7 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 568–578 Object recognition: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 885–892 Computer vision: * ACM 1998, I.2.10 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 863–898 * Nilsson 1998, chpt. 6 Robotics: * ACM 1998, I.2.9, * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 901–942, * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 443–460 Moving and configuration space: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 916–932 Tecuci 2012. Robotic mapping (localization, etc): * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 908–915 Cadena, Cesar; Carlone, Luca; Carrillo, Henry; Latif, Yasir; Scaramuzza, Davide; Neira, Jose; Reid, Ian; Leonard, John J. (December 2016). "Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 32 (6): 1309–1332. arXiv:1606.05830. Bibcode:2016arXiv160605830C. doi:10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754. S2CID 2596787. Moravec, Hans (1988). Mind Children. Harvard University Press. p. 15. Chan, Szu Ping (15 November 2015). "This is what will happen when robots take over the world". Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 23 April 2018. "IKEA furniture and the limits of AI". The Economist. 2018. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Kismet. Thompson, Derek (2018). "What Jobs Will the Robots Take?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Scassellati, Brian (2002). "Theory of mind for a humanoid robot". Autonomous Robots. 12 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1023/A:1013298507114. S2CID 1979315. Cao, Yongcan; Yu, Wenwu; Ren, Wei; Chen, Guanrong (February 2013). "An Overview of Recent Progress in the Study of Distributed Multi-Agent Coordination". IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 9 (1): 427–438. arXiv:1207.3231. doi:10.1109/TII.2012.2219061. S2CID 9588126. Thro 1993. Edelson 1991. Tao & Tan 2005. Poria, Soujanya; Cambria, Erik; Bajpai, Rajiv; Hussain, Amir (September 2017). "A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion". Information Fusion. 37: 98–125. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003. hdl:1893/25490. Emotion and affective computing: * Minsky 2006 Waddell, Kaveh (2018). "Chatbots Have Entered the Uncanny Valley". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018. Pennachin, C.; Goertzel, B. (2007). Contemporary Approaches to Artificial General Intelligence. Artificial General Intelligence. Cognitive Technologies. Cognitive Technologies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4_1. ISBN 978-3-540-23733-4. Roberts, Jacob (2016). "Thinking Machines: The Search for Artificial Intelligence". Distillations. Vol. 2 no. 2. pp. 14–23. Archived from the original on 19 August 2018. Retrieved 20 March 2018. "The superhero of artificial intelligence: can this genius keep it in check?". the Guardian. 16 February 2016. Archived from the original on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018. Mnih, Volodymyr; Kavukcuoglu, Koray; Silver, David; Rusu, Andrei A.; Veness, Joel; Bellemare, Marc G.; Graves, Alex; Riedmiller, Martin; Fidjeland, Andreas K.; Ostrovski, Georg; Petersen, Stig; Beattie, Charles; Sadik, Amir; Antonoglou, Ioannis; King, Helen; Kumaran, Dharshan; Wierstra, Daan; Legg, Shane; Hassabis, Demis (26 February 2015). "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning". Nature. 518 (7540): 529–533. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..529M. doi:10.1038/nature14236. PMID 25719670. S2CID 205242740. Sample, Ian (14 March 2017). "Google's DeepMind makes AI program that can learn like a human". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018. "From not working to neural networking". The Economist. 2016. Archived from the original on 31 December 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2018. Domingos 2015. Artificial brain arguments: AI requires a simulation of the operation of the human brain * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 957 * Crevier 1993, pp. 271 and 279 A few of the people who make some form of the argument: * Moravec 1988 * Kurzweil 2005, p. 262 * Hawkins & Blakeslee 2005 The most extreme form of this argument (the brain replacement scenario) was put forward by Clark Glymour in the mid-1970s and was touched on by Zenon Pylyshyn and John Searle in 1980. Goertzel, Ben; Lian, Ruiting; Arel, Itamar; de Garis, Hugo; Chen, Shuo (December 2010). "A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures". Neurocomputing. 74 (1–3): 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2010.08.012. Nilsson 1983, p. 10. Nils Nilsson writes: "Simply put, there is wide disagreement in the field about what AI is all about."[163] AI's immediate precursors: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 51–107 * Crevier 1993, pp. 27–32 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 15, 940 * Moravec 1988, p. 3 Haugeland 1985, pp. 112–117 The most dramatic case of sub-symbolic AI being pushed into the background was the devastating critique of perceptrons by Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert in 1969. See History of AI, AI winter, or Frank Rosenblatt. Cognitive simulation, Newell and Simon, AI at CMU (then called Carnegie Tech): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 139–179, 245–250, 322–323 (EPAM) * Crevier 1993, pp. 145–149 Soar (history): * McCorduck 2004, pp. 450–451 * Crevier 1993, pp. 258–263 McCarthy and AI research at SAIL and SRI International: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 251–259 * Crevier 1993 AI research at Edinburgh and in France, birth of Prolog: * Crevier 1993, pp. 193–196 * Howe 1994 AI at MIT under Marvin Minsky in the 1960s : * McCorduck 2004, pp. 259–305 * Crevier 1993, pp. 83–102, 163–176 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 19 Cyc: * McCorduck 2004, p. 489, who calls it "a determinedly scruffy enterprise" * Crevier 1993, pp. 239–243 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 363−365 * Lenat & Guha 1989 Knowledge revolution: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 266–276, 298–300, 314, 421 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 22–23 Frederick, Hayes-Roth; William, Murray; Leonard, Adelman. "Expert systems". AccessScience. doi:10.1036/1097-8542.248550. Embodied approaches to AI: * McCorduck 2004, pp. 454–462 * Brooks 1990 * Moravec 1988 Weng et al. 2001. Lungarella et al. 2003. Asada et al. 2009. Oudeyer 2010. Revival of connectionism: * Crevier 1993, pp. 214–215 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 25 Computational intelligence * IEEE Computational Intelligence Society Archived 9 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine Hutson, Matthew (16 February 2018). "Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis". Science. pp. 725–726. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..725H. doi:10.1126/science.359.6377.725. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018. Norvig 2012. Langley 2011. Katz 2012. The intelligent agent paradigm: * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 27, 32–58, 968–972 * Poole, Mackworth & Goebel 1998, pp. 7–21 * Luger & Stubblefield 2004, pp. 235–240 * Hutter 2005, pp. 125–126 The definition used in this article, in terms of goals, actions, perception and environment, is due to Russell & Norvig (2003). Other definitions also include knowledge and learning as additional criteria. Agent architectures, hybrid intelligent systems: * Russell & Norvig (2003, pp. 27, 932, 970–972) * Nilsson (1998, chpt. 25) Hierarchical control system: * Albus 2002 Lieto, Antonio; Lebiere, Christian; Oltramari, Alessandro (May 2018). "The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possibile developments". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 39–55. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.001. hdl:2318/1665207. S2CID 206868967. Lieto, Antonio; Bhatt, Mehul; Oltramari, Alessandro; Vernon, David (May 2018). "The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence". Cognitive Systems Research. 48: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.08.003. hdl:2318/1665249. S2CID 36189683. Russell & Norvig 2009, p. 1. White Paper: On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2020. p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 February 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020. CNN 2006. Using AI to predict flight delays Archived 20 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Ishti.org. N. Aletras; D. Tsarapatsanis; D. Preotiuc-Pietro; V. Lampos (2016). "Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective". PeerJ Computer Science. 2: e93. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.93. "The Economist Explains: Why firms are piling into artificial intelligence". The Economist. 31 March 2016. Archived from the original on 8 May 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2016. Lohr, Steve (28 February 2016). "The Promise of Artificial Intelligence Unfolds in Small Steps". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 February 2016. Retrieved 29 February 2016. Frangoul, Anmar (14 June 2019). "A Californian business is using A.I. to change the way we think about energy storage". CNBC. Archived from the original on 25 July 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2019. Wakefield, Jane (15 June 2016). "Social media 'outstrips TV' as news source for young people". BBC News. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Smith, Mark (22 July 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 25 July 2016. Brown, Eileen. "Half of Americans do not believe deepfake news could target them online". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2019. The Turing test: Turing's original publication: * Turing 1950 Historical influence and philosophical implications: * Haugeland 1985, pp. 6–9 * Crevier 1993, p. 24 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 70–71 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 2–3 and 948 Dartmouth proposal: * McCarthy et al. 1955 (the original proposal) * Crevier 1993, p. 49 (historical significance) The physical symbol systems hypothesis: * Newell & Simon 1976, p. 116 * McCorduck 2004, p. 153 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 18 Dreyfus 1992, p. 156. Dreyfus criticized the necessary condition of the physical symbol system hypothesis, which he called the "psychological assumption": "The mind can be viewed as a device operating on bits of information according to formal rules."[206] Dreyfus' critique of artificial intelligence: * Dreyfus 1972, Dreyfus & Dreyfus 1986 * Crevier 1993, pp. 120–132 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 211–239 * Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 950–952, Gödel 1951: in this lecture, Kurt Gödel uses the incompleteness theorem to arrive at the following disjunction: (a) the human mind is not a consistent finite machine, or (b) there exist Diophantine equations for which it cannot decide whether solutions exist. Gödel finds (b) implausible, and thus seems to have believed the human mind was not equivalent to a finite machine, i.e., its power exceeded that of any finite machine. He recognized that this was only a conjecture, since one could never disprove (b). Yet he considered the disjunctive conclusion to be a "certain fact". The Mathematical Objection: * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 949 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 448–449 Making the Mathematical Objection: * Lucas 1961 * Penrose 1989 Refuting Mathematical Objection: * Turing 1950 under "(2) The Mathematical Objection" * Hofstadter 1979 Background: * Gödel 1931, Church 1936, Kleene 1935, Turing 1937 Graham Oppy (20 January 2015). "Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2016. These Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments are, however, problematic, and there is wide consensus that they fail. Stuart J. Russell; Peter Norvig (2010). "26.1.2: Philosophical Foundations/Weak AI: Can Machines Act Intelligently?/The mathematical objection". Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-604259-4. even if we grant that computers have limitations on what they can prove, there is no evidence that humans are immune from those limitations. Mark Colyvan. An introduction to the philosophy of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2012. From 2.2.2, 'Philosophical significance of Gödel's incompleteness results': "The accepted wisdom (with which I concur) is that the Lucas-Penrose arguments fail." Iphofen, Ron; Kritikos, Mihalis (3 January 2019). "Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society". Contemporary Social Science: 1–15. doi:10.1080/21582041.2018.1563803. ISSN 2158-2041. "Ethical AI Learns Human Rights Framework". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 11 November 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2019. Crevier 1993, pp. 132–144. In the early 1970s, Kenneth Colby presented a version of Weizenbaum's ELIZA known as DOCTOR which he promoted as a serious therapeutic tool.[216] Joseph Weizenbaum's critique of AI: * Weizenbaum 1976 * Crevier 1993, pp. 132–144 * McCorduck 2004, pp. 356–373 * Russell & Norvig 2003, p. 961 Weizenbaum (the AI researcher who developed the first chatterbot program, ELIZA) argued in 1976 that the misuse of artificial intelligence has the potential to devalue human life. Wendell Wallach (2010). Moral Machines, Oxford University Press. Wallach, pp 37–54. Wallach, pp 55–73. Wallach, Introduction chapter. Michael Anderson and Susan Leigh Anderson (2011), Machine Ethics, Cambridge University Press. "Machine Ethics". aaai.org. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Rubin, Charles (Spring 2003). "Artificial Intelligence and Human Nature". The New Atlantis. 1: 88–100. Archived from the original on 11 June 2012. Brooks, Rodney (10 November 2014). "artificial intelligence is a tool, not a threat". Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. "Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates Warn About Artificial Intelligence". Observer. 19 August 2015. Archived from the original on 30 October 2015. Retrieved 30 October 2015. Chalmers, David (1995). "Facing up to the problem of consciousness". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2 (3): 200–219. Archived from the original on 8 March 2005. Retrieved 11 October 2018. See also this link Archived 8 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine Horst, Steven, (2005) "The Computational Theory of Mind" Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Searle 1980, p. 1. This version is from Searle (1999), and is also quoted in Dennett 1991, p. 435. Searle's original formulation was "The appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states." [230] Strong AI is defined similarly by Russell & Norvig (2003, p. 947): "The assertion that machines could possibly act intelligently
shubham001official
🚗🚦 Introducing our Smart Adaptive Traffic Management System! 📷🧠 Using YOLO v8 object detection & CCTV cameras, we analyze real-time traffic. By tracking vehicles 🚙 & pedestrians 🚶, we enhance signal timings for better flow, safety, & reduced congestion. Drive smarter with us! 🌐🏞️
iamrishav111
Deals with an idea to Remove Traffic Congestion in metropolitan cities and maintain smooth flow of traffic thereby reducing Traffic Jams.
codefeeder
The traffic light duration is calculated using a model calculating weighted mean of the following factors :- a) The congestion coefficient calculated using image recognition applied on live feed captured by cctv cameras b) Live location and bearing angle of the approaching emergency vehicle from the nearest traffic signal
Elcampeoncr7
Smart Traffic Light Management System employs SUMO and reinforcement learning to dynamically optimize signal timings, reducing congestion and enhancing traffic flow at San Jose downtown. Adapting to real-time patterns, the system efficiently minimizes delays, elevating the overall urban mobility experience
ideas4u
This project is the most awaited project in open source community where every user who belongs to Stock Trading always wanted to develop its own software. This project has been developed specifically for Indian Market Stock Trading. It encompasses end to end trading cycle for intraday trading but the design would be such that it can be easily extended for delivery trading. During the lifecycle of this project we will be using most advance technologies but the base code will always be C/C++. Development Methodology: ======================== We use "Incremental Life Cycle Model" along with Cross-Platform Development (Portable). Project Priorities and Assumptions: =================================== 1) Low Latency, High Performance all the time. 2) Wherever choice has to be made between memory and execution speed, we give preference to speed. 3) Every module devloped will be exhaustively tested. How the work Proceed: ===================== Before the beginning of any new project, we should know the "PROBLEM STATEMENT", so here it is "Problem Statement" ------------------- To Build a high performance, low latency, end to end Trading Platform for Indian Stock Market but not limited to which home users should be able use for trading which guarantees (99% of the times) the profit but does not guarantees maximized profit for intraday trading. First Step: ----------- To provide the optimal solution to any problem is "UNDERSTAING THE PROBLEM". To understand the above problem statement you need to really extract the explicit and implcit requirements from the statement. Here is the List of requirements: Explicit: --------- 1) High Performance 2) Low-Latency 3) End-to-End Trading Platform 4) Focus on Indian Stock Market but not limited to it. 5) Guarantees (99% of the times) the profit but does not guarantees maximized profit. 6) Only for Intraday Trading. Implicit: --------- 1) Book Keeping of the order and trade (Order Management System). 2) Availability of Market Data to End-Users on Demand for identifying the stock and placing the order. 3) User Account Management. Might be I missed something please suggest and after reveiw we add it here. Second Step: ------------ To understand the above Explicit/Implicit requirements, you should have the "KNOWLEDGE OF VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES" and indepth undertstanding of the "PROBLEM DOMAIN" i.e. Stock Market. Once this is achieved we need to architect the solution in terms of Software and Hardware nodes and their integration. Third Step: ----------- To solve the problem statement, the above requirements should be "DECOMPOSED IN MODULES" and map to them with technolgoies/software/hardware used. Below is the list of modules we are able to identify: Modules Included: ================= Core Modules: -------------- 1) Core Libraries 2) Manual Order Entry System 3) Auto Order Entry System 4) Artificial Exchange 5) Algorithmic Trading Platform 6) Smart Order Router 7) Direct Trading Platform (Ooptional) Utility Modules: ---------------- 8) Logger Server 9) HeartBeat Server Technologies Used: ================= Software: --------- We always use freeware, Open Source Softwares or APIs which are the part of GPL, LGPL.xx licence. Any special requirement for building/using the modules will be detailed in specific module. For development, we generally use: ---------------------------------- Windows-7 for Operating System but any other OS ca be used. Our Code is Platform Indepandant. Visual Studio 2013 in built compiler for build or Intel@ Compilers which can be easily integrated with Visual Studio IDE. For real time, we generally use: -------------------------------- Linux-susse 10 or above with real time extensions. gcc 4.4.1 for build. vi editor Hardware: --------- No special requirement for development purpose. For real time use, it depands how much Stock you are interested in and the various configuration of modules. We prefer generally the below configuration for any number of Stock Trading: 256 GB RAM 16 core processor 1 TB of HDD/SDD Programming Languages and other Technologies: --------------------------------------------- C, C++99/c++11, Lua, ZeroMq, nanodbc, Lock-Free Data Structures, Intel TBB, Boost, Google Protobuf, MySql, Python. Fourth Step: ------------ Dcompose each module till it becomes entity to provide the useful functionality. We are going to explain this in each module detailed section. Fifth Step: ------------ We do design/develop/benchmark/unit test/integration testing of the above modules. Sixth Step: ------------ We deploy the delivered software on various hardware nodes as per the deployment architecture and integrate them. Seventh Step: ------------ Observe the behaviour of deployed software on live traffic and cut two branches at this level : 1st branch continue to do incremental development and 2nd branch fix the issues reported which can be later merged with 1st branch for another release. Any suggestions for improvement are most welcome.
manaschakrabortty
No description available
UIP-Urban-Intelligence-Platform
Production-ready Multi-Agent System for Smart Traffic Management & Linked Open Data. Integrates Computer Vision (YOLOX/DETR) with Semantic Web standards (NGSI-LD, RDF, SOSA/SSN)
Sanjay072
No description available
AdityaWadkar
This repo contains simulation code of smart traffic management system project
A Smart Traffic Management System for Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam leveraging batch and real-time data processing, intuitive dashboards, and monitoring tools to optimize traffic flow, enhance safety, and support sustainable urban mobility through advanced analytics and user-friendly applications.
HlaingPhyoAung
Usage: python sqlmap.py [options] Options: -h, --help Show basic help message and exit -hh Show advanced help message and exit --version Show program's version number and exit -v VERBOSE Verbosity level: 0-6 (default 1) Target: At least one of these options has to be provided to define the target(s) -d DIRECT Connection string for direct database connection -u URL, --url=URL Target URL (e.g. "http://www.site.com/vuln.php?id=1") -l LOGFILE Parse target(s) from Burp or WebScarab proxy log file -x SITEMAPURL Parse target(s) from remote sitemap(.xml) file -m BULKFILE Scan multiple targets given in a textual file -r REQUESTFILE Load HTTP request from a file -g GOOGLEDORK Process Google dork results as target URLs -c CONFIGFILE Load options from a configuration INI file Request: These options can be used to specify how to connect to the target URL --method=METHOD Force usage of given HTTP method (e.g. PUT) --data=DATA Data string to be sent through POST --param-del=PARA.. Character used for splitting parameter values --cookie=COOKIE HTTP Cookie header value --cookie-del=COO.. Character used for splitting cookie values --load-cookies=L.. File containing cookies in Netscape/wget format --drop-set-cookie Ignore Set-Cookie header from response --user-agent=AGENT HTTP User-Agent header value --random-agent Use randomly selected HTTP User-Agent header value --host=HOST HTTP Host header value --referer=REFERER HTTP Referer header value -H HEADER, --hea.. Extra header (e.g. "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1") --headers=HEADERS Extra headers (e.g. "Accept-Language: fr\nETag: 123") --auth-type=AUTH.. HTTP authentication type (Basic, Digest, NTLM or PKI) --auth-cred=AUTH.. HTTP authentication credentials (name:password) --auth-file=AUTH.. HTTP authentication PEM cert/private key file --ignore-401 Ignore HTTP Error 401 (Unauthorized) --proxy=PROXY Use a proxy to connect to the target URL --proxy-cred=PRO.. Proxy authentication credentials (name:password) --proxy-file=PRO.. Load proxy list from a file --ignore-proxy Ignore system default proxy settings --tor Use Tor anonymity network --tor-port=TORPORT Set Tor proxy port other than default --tor-type=TORTYPE Set Tor proxy type (HTTP (default), SOCKS4 or SOCKS5) --check-tor Check to see if Tor is used properly --delay=DELAY Delay in seconds between each HTTP request --timeout=TIMEOUT Seconds to wait before timeout connection (default 30) --retries=RETRIES Retries when the connection timeouts (default 3) --randomize=RPARAM Randomly change value for given parameter(s) --safe-url=SAFEURL URL address to visit frequently during testing --safe-post=SAFE.. POST data to send to a safe URL --safe-req=SAFER.. Load safe HTTP request from a file --safe-freq=SAFE.. Test requests between two visits to a given safe URL --skip-urlencode Skip URL encoding of payload data --csrf-token=CSR.. Parameter used to hold anti-CSRF token --csrf-url=CSRFURL URL address to visit to extract anti-CSRF token --force-ssl Force usage of SSL/HTTPS --hpp Use HTTP parameter pollution method --eval=EVALCODE Evaluate provided Python code before the request (e.g. "import hashlib;id2=hashlib.md5(id).hexdigest()") Optimization: These options can be used to optimize the performance of sqlmap -o Turn on all optimization switches --predict-output Predict common queries output --keep-alive Use persistent HTTP(s) connections --null-connection Retrieve page length without actual HTTP response body --threads=THREADS Max number of concurrent HTTP(s) requests (default 1) Injection: These options can be used to specify which parameters to test for, provide custom injection payloads and optional tampering scripts -p TESTPARAMETER Testable parameter(s) --skip=SKIP Skip testing for given parameter(s) --skip-static Skip testing parameters that not appear dynamic --dbms=DBMS Force back-end DBMS to this value --dbms-cred=DBMS.. DBMS authentication credentials (user:password) --os=OS Force back-end DBMS operating system to this value --invalid-bignum Use big numbers for invalidating values --invalid-logical Use logical operations for invalidating values --invalid-string Use random strings for invalidating values --no-cast Turn off payload casting mechanism --no-escape Turn off string escaping mechanism --prefix=PREFIX Injection payload prefix string --suffix=SUFFIX Injection payload suffix string --tamper=TAMPER Use given script(s) for tampering injection data Detection: These options can be used to customize the detection phase --level=LEVEL Level of tests to perform (1-5, default 1) --risk=RISK Risk of tests to perform (1-3, default 1) --string=STRING String to match when query is evaluated to True --not-string=NOT.. String to match when query is evaluated to False --regexp=REGEXP Regexp to match when query is evaluated to True --code=CODE HTTP code to match when query is evaluated to True --text-only Compare pages based only on the textual content --titles Compare pages based only on their titles Techniques: These options can be used to tweak testing of specific SQL injection techniques --technique=TECH SQL injection techniques to use (default "BEUSTQ") --time-sec=TIMESEC Seconds to delay the DBMS response (default 5) --union-cols=UCOLS Range of columns to test for UNION query SQL injection --union-char=UCHAR Character to use for bruteforcing number of columns --union-from=UFROM Table to use in FROM part of UNION query SQL injection --dns-domain=DNS.. Domain name used for DNS exfiltration attack --second-order=S.. Resulting page URL searched for second-order response Fingerprint: -f, --fingerprint Perform an extensive DBMS version fingerprint Enumeration: These options can be used to enumerate the back-end database management system information, structure and data contained in the tables. Moreover you can run your own SQL statements -a, --all Retrieve everything -b, --banner Retrieve DBMS banner --current-user Retrieve DBMS current user --current-db Retrieve DBMS current database --hostname Retrieve DBMS server hostname --is-dba Detect if the DBMS current user is DBA --users Enumerate DBMS users --passwords Enumerate DBMS users password hashes --privileges Enumerate DBMS users privileges --roles Enumerate DBMS users roles --dbs Enumerate DBMS databases --tables Enumerate DBMS database tables --columns Enumerate DBMS database table columns --schema Enumerate DBMS schema --count Retrieve number of entries for table(s) --dump Dump DBMS database table entries --dump-all Dump all DBMS databases tables entries --search Search column(s), table(s) and/or database name(s) --comments Retrieve DBMS comments -D DB DBMS database to enumerate -T TBL DBMS database table(s) to enumerate -C COL DBMS database table column(s) to enumerate -X EXCLUDECOL DBMS database table column(s) to not enumerate -U USER DBMS user to enumerate --exclude-sysdbs Exclude DBMS system databases when enumerating tables --pivot-column=P.. Pivot column name --where=DUMPWHERE Use WHERE condition while table dumping --start=LIMITSTART First query output entry to retrieve --stop=LIMITSTOP Last query output entry to retrieve --first=FIRSTCHAR First query output word character to retrieve --last=LASTCHAR Last query output word character to retrieve --sql-query=QUERY SQL statement to be executed --sql-shell Prompt for an interactive SQL shell --sql-file=SQLFILE Execute SQL statements from given file(s) Brute force: These options can be used to run brute force checks --common-tables Check existence of common tables --common-columns Check existence of common columns User-defined function injection: These options can be used to create custom user-defined functions --udf-inject Inject custom user-defined functions --shared-lib=SHLIB Local path of the shared library File system access: These options can be used to access the back-end database management system underlying file system --file-read=RFILE Read a file from the back-end DBMS file system --file-write=WFILE Write a local file on the back-end DBMS file system --file-dest=DFILE Back-end DBMS absolute filepath to write to Operating system access: These options can be used to access the back-end database management system underlying operating system --os-cmd=OSCMD Execute an operating system command --os-shell Prompt for an interactive operating system shell --os-pwn Prompt for an OOB shell, Meterpreter or VNC --os-smbrelay One click prompt for an OOB shell, Meterpreter or VNC --os-bof Stored procedure buffer overflow exploitation --priv-esc Database process user privilege escalation --msf-path=MSFPATH Local path where Metasploit Framework is installed --tmp-path=TMPPATH Remote absolute path of temporary files directory Windows registry access: These options can be used to access the back-end database management system Windows registry --reg-read Read a Windows registry key value --reg-add Write a Windows registry key value data --reg-del Delete a Windows registry key value --reg-key=REGKEY Windows registry key --reg-value=REGVAL Windows registry key value --reg-data=REGDATA Windows registry key value data --reg-type=REGTYPE Windows registry key value type General: These options can be used to set some general working parameters -s SESSIONFILE Load session from a stored (.sqlite) file -t TRAFFICFILE Log all HTTP traffic into a textual file --batch Never ask for user input, use the default behaviour --binary-fields=.. Result fields having binary values (e.g. "digest") --charset=CHARSET Force character encoding used for data retrieval --crawl=CRAWLDEPTH Crawl the website starting from the target URL --crawl-exclude=.. Regexp to exclude pages from crawling (e.g. "logout") --csv-del=CSVDEL Delimiting character used in CSV output (default ",") --dump-format=DU.. Format of dumped data (CSV (default), HTML or SQLITE) --eta Display for each output the estimated time of arrival --flush-session Flush session files for current target --forms Parse and test forms on target URL --fresh-queries Ignore query results stored in session file --hex Use DBMS hex function(s) for data retrieval --output-dir=OUT.. Custom output directory path --parse-errors Parse and display DBMS error messages from responses --save=SAVECONFIG Save options to a configuration INI file --scope=SCOPE Regexp to filter targets from provided proxy log --test-filter=TE.. Select tests by payloads and/or titles (e.g. ROW) --test-skip=TEST.. Skip tests by payloads and/or titles (e.g. BENCHMARK) --update Update sqlmap Miscellaneous: -z MNEMONICS Use short mnemonics (e.g. "flu,bat,ban,tec=EU") --alert=ALERT Run host OS command(s) when SQL injection is found --answers=ANSWERS Set question answers (e.g. "quit=N,follow=N") --beep Beep on question and/or when SQL injection is found --cleanup Clean up the DBMS from sqlmap specific UDF and tables --dependencies Check for missing (non-core) sqlmap dependencies --disable-coloring Disable console output coloring --gpage=GOOGLEPAGE Use Google dork results from specified page number --identify-waf Make a thorough testing for a WAF/IPS/IDS protection --skip-waf Skip heuristic detection of WAF/IPS/IDS protection --mobile Imitate smartphone through HTTP User-Agent header --offline Work in offline mode (only use session data) --page-rank Display page rank (PR) for Google dork results --purge-output Safely remove all content from output directory --smart Conduct thorough tests only if positive heuristic(s) --sqlmap-shell Prompt for an interactive sqlmap shell --wizard Simple wizard interface for beginner users
we will be going to accomplish this project by using Python Networking, BLOB, Haar-Cascade, OpenCV, Raspberry Pi
arjunc246
Smart Traffic Management System which changes window time of green light based on density of vehicles.
This project is a smart traffic management system designed to optimize traffic light cycles based on real-time data, with special prioritization for emergency vehicles. By dynamically adjusting green-light timings, it aims to reduce congestion and enable emergency vehicles to navigate intersections more efficiently.
SumeetGadewar27
An automatic traffic red-light violation detection system was implemented, which may play a big role in transportation management in smart cities. The system mainly relies on modern computer vision techniques, which was implemented in OpenCV under Python environment. Mainly, the system consists of object detector and object tracker which work in an integrated manner in order to precisely keep position of the existing cars. The primary task of the system is to eventually indicate locations of violating vehicles. The output showed accurate results, as all violating vehicles were detected and distinguished precisely.
Rudrakaniya
C++ Project on Traffic Management using File handling
MuhammedDaud
No description available
samithawijesekara
No description available
This project uses YOLO-based vehicle detection and LSTM-based traffic prediction to optimize traffic light control. The simulation dynamically adjusts signal timings based on real-time vehicle counts from video feeds.
vaishnavipaswan
Smart Traffic Congestion Management System (TCMS) is an AI-powered system that dynamically adjusts traffic light timings based on real-time vehicle density using YOLOv5 and adaptive algorithms. It reduces congestion, optimizes traffic flow, and improves urban mobility.
later
There has been a population increase which has consequently led to traffic congestion in the city of Karachi. Making a smart traffic management system that makes use of video and picture data of the traffic on the roads of Karachi, Pakistan. This works by performing machine learning using an algorithm over the recent frame obtained from the video to estimate the number of vehicles present in a scene. Cameras will be installed on the opposite of the lane, beside the traffic light and will take its real-time video. At the back-end, Raspberry Pi would be connected to handle video processing. Raspberry pi would receive video as input from the camera of each road. Image framing would capture frames from the video at several fixed intervals. By taking our city, Karachi, into consideration we are creating our data set based on images captured from within the city. The proposed project aims to make decisions for the traffic signal timings based on vehicle densities. The project will be deployed on a four-way traffic signal. It will make use of image processing to separate image frames while machine learning algorithms will perform the task of signal controlling and vehicle detection. The reason for using Image Processing and machine learning is because it keeps production costs are low while achieving high speed and accuracy.
neelgeek
A smart traffic signal management system which uses Reinforcement Learning and Computer Vision to optimise traffic signal timings according to realtime traffic scenario.
roshan9419
This is a C++ project on Smart Traffic Management System using File Handling topic of C++
vaniarya
No description available
JeromeGeek
Created an intelligent system that monitors and controls traffic based on density; detects overspeeding using Doppler Effect and extracts license plate numbers using Digital Image Processing, issuing automatic fines to registered drivers; detects accidents and sends automatic SOS alerts using OpenCV
ujjwaltomar
Smart Traffic Management system helps in decision making and switch traffic lights according to the traffic density in the lane. It also priorities the ambulance etc.
kavyaguptaeng
Created a Smart traffic light system to fight congestion by identifying the 2 lanes problems in India using Python and it's libraries like OpenCV, NumPy, collections etc. and put step forward in AI & ML Technology and showcased with help of IOT components like LED's and Arduino UNO.